Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;20(9):e45907. doi: 10.15252/embr.201845907

Figure EV5. Basal synaptic transmission of NMDA‐ and AMPA‐mediated EPSCs do not differ by PHF2 expression levels.

Figure EV5

  • A, B
    Recording of NMDAR‐ (A) and AMPAR‐mediated (B) PPR at 50, 100, 150, and 200 ms intervals. Insets indicate raw trace of PPR (Top). Scale bars, 100 pA/150 ms.
  • C, D
    Recording of NMDAR‐ (C) and AMPAR‐mediated (D) PPR at 50, 100, 150, and 200 ms intervals. Insets indicate raw trace of PPR (Top). Scale bars, 100 pA/150 ms.
Data information: In (A‐D), data are presented as mean values ± SEM (sh‐Con, n = 14; sh‐PHF2, n = 13; wild type, n = 16; PHF2 t/g, n = 26).