Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;24:101993. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101993

Table 2.

Group comparisons.

A. MFC (s-2)
Control group (n = 29)
ADHD group (n = 30)
Group comparison
Region Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Statistic p-Value Effect size
GP 579.4 (204.6) 546.7 (159.2) t = 0.7 0.495 d = 0.2; small
PUT 242.9 (92.7) 244.3 (74.8) t = −0.1 0.950 d = 0.0; small
CN 284.1 (88.8) 285.1 (88.2) U = 422 0.851 rrb = 0.0; small
THL 143.5 (36.8) 153.6 (36.4) U = 342 0.162 rrb = 0.2; small
RN 230.9 (77.6) 243.1 (121.1) U = 423 0.863 rrb = 0.0; small



B. R2* (s-1)
Control group (n = 23)
ADHD group (n = 23)
Group comparison
Region Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Statistic p-Value Effect size
GP 31.0 (3.6) 31.0 (3.3) t = 0.1 0.957 d = 0.0; small
PUT 19.5 (2.3) 19.9 (1.7) t = −0.6 0.550 d = 0.2; small
CN 18.4 (1.6) 19.4 (2.7) U = 214 0.275 rrb = 0.2; small
THL 18.7 (1.3) 18.7 (1.3) U = 241 0.617 rrb = 0.1; small
RN 23.8 (4.0) 23.5(3.3) U = 248 0.728 rrb = 0.1; small

GP: globus pallidus; PUT: putamen; CN: caudate nucleus; THL: thalamus; RN: red nucleus; t: Student's t-test (two-tailed); U: Mann-Whitney U test (Exact Sig. two-tailed); SD: standard deviation; d: Cohen's d; rrb: rank biserial correlation.