Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;21(10):1015–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2019.07.011

Table 8.

Correlation between the Four Markers on Comparing Each of the Three Scoring Schemes Using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient

A. Immunohistochemical Scoring (IHS)
MCM4 IHS MCM2 IHS Ki-67 IHS
MCM6 IHS 0.828 [0.792-0.858] (<.0001) 0.530 [0.434-0.611] (<.0001) 0.73 [0.674-0.777] (<.0001)
MCM4 IHS 0.514 [0.413-0.597] (<.0001) 0.664 [0.594-0.723] (<.0001)
MCM2 IHS 0.386 [0.259-0.492] (<.0001)
B. Percentage Scoring (%)
MCM4% MCM2% Ki-67%
MCM6% 0.911 [0.892-0.926] (<.0001) 0.861 [0.833-0.885] (<.0001) 0.787 [0.742-0.823] (<.0001)
MCM4% 0.864 [0.836-0.888] (<.0001) 0.781 [0.735-0.819] (<.0001)
MCM2% 0.828 [0.793-0.858] (<.0001)
C. Visiomorph Tissuemorph Scoring (Vis. Tis. S.)
MCM4 Vis.Tis.S MCM2 Vis.Tis.S Ki-67 Vis.Tis.S
MCM6 Vis.Tis.S 0.913 [0.895-0.928] (<.0001) 0.850 [0.819-0.875] (<.0001) 0.741 [0.688-0.786] (<.0001)
MCM4 Vis.Tis.S 0.846 [0.815-0.873] (<.0001) 0.769 [0.720-0.809] (<.0001)
MCM2 Vis.Tis.S 0.715 [0.656-0.764] (<.0001)

IHS: immunohistochemical score, %: percentage score, Vis. Tis. S.: Visiomorph Tissuemorph score.

ICC can be interpreted as follows:

0.0-0.2 indicates poor agreement;

0.3-0.4 indicates fair agreement;

0.5-0.6 indicates moderate agreement;

0.7-0.8 indicates strong agreement; and

>0.8 indicates almost perfect agreement.