TABLE 2—

Intervention Effects on Dating Violence Perpetration and Victimization at Second Follow-Up Among the Total and Dating Analytic Samples: Me & You: Building Healthy Relationships, Southeast Texas, 2014 to 2015

	Total Analytic Samplea				Dating Analytic Sample
	No.b	Intervention,c % Yes	Comparison,c % Yes	AOR (95% CI)	No.b	Intervention,c % Yes	Comparison,c % Yes	AOR (95% CI)
Ever perpetrated
DV	641	11.0	21.5	0.46 (0.28, 0.74)	299	19.7	28.4	0.50 (0.28, 0.90)
Physical DV	671	5.1	12.5	0.35 (0.19, 0.66)	328	8.5	15.6	0.39 (0.18, 0.83)
Psychological DV	658	18.2	28.7	0.62 (0.41, 0.96)	317	30.3	38.8	0.60 (0.33, 1.07)
Threatening DV	668	3.0	8.3	0.33 (0.15, 0.71)	323	4.8	10.2	0.30 (0.11, 0.79)
Cyber DV	662	2.8	6.4	0.57 (0.25, 1.29)	317	4.8	8.9	0.55 (0.22, 1.42)
Sexual DV	683	1.9	4.1	0.49 (0.18, 1.34)	336	3.7	6.2	0.58 (0.19, 1.73)
Ever victimized by
DV	634	11.9	21.0	0.58 (0.33, 1.01)	296	21.9	30.2	0.68 (0.38, 1.22)
Physical DV	668	5.3	8.8	0.64 (0.33, 1.26)	322	10.0	12.3	0.76 (0.35, 1.63)
Psychological DV	661	19.8	26.1	0.66 (0.39, 1.10)	318	33.5	36.0	0.73 (0.45, 1.20)
Threatening DV	664	3.3	7.6	0.36 (0.17, 0.78)	319	6.5	9.6	0.52 (0.22, 1.25)
Cyber DV	647	3.3	7.0	0.51 (0.23, 1.12)	305	5.4	10.7	0.42 (0.16, 1.06)
Sexual DV	680	3.7	8.6	0.32 (0.11, 0.94)	333	6.9	12.0	0.42 (0.18, 1.00)

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; DV = dating violence. All models adjusted for baseline value of dependent variable, age, gender, race/ethnicity, and time between assessments. DV was a dichotomous variable and categorized as participation in 1 or more DV types (physical, psychological, threatening, sexual, or cyber) versus no participation in any types. Dichotomous variables were created for each specific DV type (participation vs no participation).

^aThe total sample includes both daters and nondaters.

^bSample sizes reflect those used for the adjusted models and vary because of missing data.

^cUnadjusted percentages.