TABLE 1:

Microtubule sliding velocities in control buffer or buffer with the indicated purified expressed protein added.

Strain	Condition	µm/s ± SEM	n	p valuea
WT	Control	17.10 ± 0.43	114
pf18	Control	13.16 ± 0.40	108
	+His-PACRG	13.51 ± 0.37	102	p = 0.52
	+His-FAP20	13.84 ± 0.39	105	p = 0.22
	+His-PACRG/-FAP20	13.91 ± 0.55	68	p = 0.27
pacrg (pf12)	Control	14.13 ± 0.28	130
	+His-PACRG	17.29 ± 0.41	131	p < 0.0001
	+His-FAP20	13.37 ± 0.50	70	p = 0.19
	+His-PACRG/-FAP20	16.18 ± 0.62	69	p = 0.004
pacrgR	Control	16.96 ± 0.41	103	p < 0.0001
fap20 (RL11)	Control	13.95 ± 0.30	123
	+His-PACRG	13.56 ± 0.42	68	p = 0.45
	+His-FAP20	17.78 ± 0.37	116	p < 0.0001
	+His-PACRG/-FAP20	18.10 ± 0.43	69	p < 0.0001
fap20R	Control	17.09 ± 0.62	85	p < 0.0001
pacrg; fap20	Control	13.40 ± 0.36	98
	+His-PACRG	13.60 ± 0.41	95	p = 0.71
	+His-FAP20	15.23 ± 0.36	133	p = 0.0004
	+His-PACRG/-FAP20	17.73 ± 0.36	131	p < 0.0001

^aStudents’s t test was used to determine the p value when comparing a condition’s velocity to the control velocity of that same strain.