TABLE 2:
Student’s t test values of various comparisons of microtubule sliding velocities.
| Samples compared | p value |
|---|---|
| WT vs. pacrg | p < 0.0001 |
| WT vs. fap20 | p < 0.0001 |
| WT vs. pacrg; fap20 | p < 0.0001 |
| WT vs. pacrgR | p = 0.817 |
| WT vs. fap20R | p = 0.986 |
| WT vs. pacrg + His-PACRG | p = 0.764 |
| WT vs. fap20 + His-FAP20 | p = 0.175 |
| WT vs. pacrg; fap20 + His-PACRG/His-FAP20 | p = 0.271 |
| pacrg; fap20 vs. pacrg | p = 0.115 |
| pacrg; fap20 vs. fap20 | p = 0.237 |
|
fap20 vs. pacrg; fap20 + His-PACRG (both +PACRG, no FAP20) |
p = 0.498 |
|
pacrg vs. pacrg; fap20 + His-FAP20 (both +FAP20, no PACRG) |
p = 0.017 |
|
pacrg + His-PACRG vs. fap20 + His-FAP20 (both +PACRG, +FAP20) |
p = 0.273 |
|
pacrg + His-PACRG vs. pacrg; fap20 + His-PACRG/ His-FAP20 (both +PACRG, +FAP20) |
p = 0.410 |
|
fap20 + His-FAP20 vs. pacrg; fap20 + His-PACRG/ His-FAP20 (both +PACRG, +FAP20) |
p = 0.759 |
|
pacrg + His-PACRG vs. pacrg + His-PACRG/ His-FAP20 (both +PACRG, +FAP20) |
p = 0.141 |
|
fap20 + His-FAP20 vs. fap20 + His-PACRG/ His-FAP20 (both +PACRG, +FAP20) |
p = 0.717 |