Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 15;37(10):1927–1938. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002105

TABLE 3.

Baseline versus postintervention changes in blood pressure for isometric resistance training versus control participants included in the individual participant data meta-analysis

One-step model Exercise mean difference (mmHg) (95% CI) Control mean difference (mmHg) (95% CI) P, treatment effect
Δ SBP −6.22 (−7.75 to −4.68) −0.14 (−1.93 to 1.65) <0.00001
Δ DBP −2.78 (−3.92 to −1.65) −0.45 (−1.76 to 0.85) 0.002
Δ MAP −4.12 (−5.39 to −2.85) −0.32 (−1.76 to 1.13) <0.00001
Two-step model, n = 12, included studies exercise versus control mean difference mmHg (95% CI) Exercise versus control mean difference (mmHg) (95% CI) P, treatment effect
ΔSBP −7.32 (−8.93 to −5.71); I2 = 22% <0.00001
ΔDBP −3.29 (−5.12 to −1.46); I2 = 63% 0.0004
ΔMAP −4.63 (−6.18 to −3.09); I2 = 47% <0.00001
Two-step model, n = 6, excluded studies Exercise versus control mean difference (mmHg) (95% CI) P, treatment effect
ΔSBP −5.61 (−9.04 to −2.19); I2 = 82% 0.001
ΔDBP −4.27 (−7.92 to −0.62); I2 = 91% 0.02
ΔMAP −1.92 (−3.00 to −0.84); I2 = 7% 0.0005

One-step and two-step model analyses. CI, confidence interval; MAP, mean arterial pressure.