. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 5.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jan 23;38(9):2151–2164. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2894322

Table IV.

Comparison of clinical measures between SSLLN-HR, SSLLN-LR+SR and manual measurements on 600 volumetric cardiac images. SSLLN-HR was validated on high-resolution volumes from Dataset 1, whilst SSLLN-LR+SR was validated on 600 low-resolution volumes, simulated from the corresponding high-resolution volumes. The 4th/5th columns show absolute difference between automated and manual measures.

	SSLLN-HR*	SSLLN-LR+SR^†	Manual	* vs Manual	† vs Manual
LVV (ml)	148.392±34.352	151.048±35.016	147.638±34.711	4.623±4.014	6.066±5.782
LVM (gram)	123.028±24.123	124.240±24.383	119.278±25.685	5.551±4.308	6.737±5.244
RVV (ml)	168.638±37.144	174.383±39.480	171.553±38.622	8.547±7.540	9.299±8.551
RVM (gram)	35.466±8.121	32.290±7.381	33.704±7.261	3.571±2.803	2.956±2.899