Abstract
Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma caused by the EWS/ATF1 fusion gene. Here, we established induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from EWS/ATF1-controllable murine CCS cells harboring sarcoma-associated genetic abnormalities. Sarcoma-iPSC mice develop secondary sarcomas immediately after EWS/ATF1 induction, but only in soft tissue. EWS/ATF1 expression induces oncogene-induced senescence in most cell types in sarcoma-iPSC mice but prevents it in sarcoma cells. We identify Tppp3-expressing cells in peripheral nerves as a cell-of-origin for these sarcomas. We show cell type-specific recruitment of EWS/ATF1 to enhancer regions in CCS cells. Finally, epigenetic silencing at these enhancers induces senescence and inhibits CCS cell growth through altered EWS/ATF1 binding. Together, we propose that distinct responses to premature senescence are the basis for the cell type-specificity of cancer development.
Subject terms: Cancer models, Reprogramming
The EWS-ATF1 fusion gene causes clear cell sarcoma (CCS). Here, the authors show that the downstream effects of EWS-ATF1 expression are strictly context dependent, and reveal the cell of origin for CCS to be Tppp3-expressing cells in peripheral nerves.
Introduction
Cell-type-specific development of cancer has long been recognized. Here, specific genes are mutated in particular types of cancer, and patients harboring germline mutations at tumor suppressor genes, such as APC and BRCA1/BRCA2, exclusively develop cancers in specific organs1–3. Similarly, differentiation status-dependent cancer development has been reported in several cancers4,5. Given that epigenetic regulations play a central role in differentiation and cell fate maintenance, these findings suggest that a coordinated action of the cancer genome and cellular context-dependent epigenetic regulations is required for cancer development. However, it is unclear how the cellular context-dependent epigenetic regulations affect cancer development and progression.
Clear-cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare tumor and preferentially arises in soft tissue in the extremities. CCS often harbors melanocytic properties, and thus resembles malignant melanoma6,7. Despite their shared properties, CCS is distinguished from malignant melanoma by the presence of a specific fusion oncogene, EWS/ATF1, which results from a reciprocal translocation, t(12;22)(q13;q12)8. Previous in vivo studies using EWS/ATF1-inducible CCS model demonstrated that EWS/ATF1 is a key driver oncogene in both the development and maintenance of the sarcomas9,10. Straessler et al.10 demonstrated that EWS/ATF1 can transform mesenchymal progenitor cells10, while our previous study suggested that the sarcomas arose from neural crest-derived cells9. However, given that mesenchymal progenitor cells and neural crest-derived cells contain diverse cell types, a cell of origin for this sarcoma remains to be fully understood.
In the present study, we establish induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from murine CCS cell lines that harbor sarcoma-associated genetic abnormalities and differentiate them into a wide variety of cell types in vivo via the generation of chimeric mice. The chimeric mice rapidly develop secondary sarcomas in a cell-type-dependent manner, which is associated with a cell-type-specific response to premature senescence. Utilizing the one-step and cell-type-specific sarcoma model, we identify Tppp3-expressing peripheral nerve cell as a cell type that gives rise to CCSs and demonstrate that cellular context-dependent epigenetic regulations, in conjunction with genetic abnormalities, play a fundamental role in the maintenance of the malignant phenotype and thus can be a therapeutic target in sarcoma cells.
Results
Establishment of iPSCs from EWS/ATF1-induced sarcoma cells
To establish iPSCs, we introduced OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4 and cMYC into a murine CCS cell line (G1297) containing doxycycline (Dox)-controllable EWS/ATF1 alleles9. iPSC-like colonies were picked up to establish iPSC-like cell lines (Fig. 1a). The established iPSC-like clones showed elevated activity of alkaline phosphatase and expressed pluripotency-related genes such as Nanog and endogenous Oct3/4 (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Global gene expression patterns of iPSC-like cells were similar to those of control PSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). DNA methylation analysis revealed demethylation of Nanog promoter and of Oct3/4 distal enhancer in iPSC-like cells (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Silencing of the exogenous 4 factors was confirmed in most iPSC-like clones (Supplementary Fig. 1f). The iPSC-like cell lines often harbored the chromosomal abnormalities detected in G1297 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1g). Additionally, exome analysis revealed that candidate mutation sites in G1297 are often mutated in iPSC-like cell line (Sarcoma-iPSC-G3) (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1h, and Supplementary Table 1). Three independent sarcoma-iPSC-like clones (G1, G2, and G3) formed teratomas and contributed to adult chimeric mice (Supplementary Fig. 1i and Fig. 1d). Together, these results confirm the establishment of iPSCs that harbor cancer-related genetic abnormalities from mouse CCS cells in the absence of EWS/ATF1 expression.
Secondary sarcoma development in sarcoma-iPSC mice
We next examined secondary sarcoma development11,12 in sarcoma-iPSC chimeric mice by inducing EWS/ATF1. For control experiments, chimeric mice were generated with embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and iPSCs, both of which contain EWS/ATF1-inducible alleles at the identical loci as sarcoma-iPSCs (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). We confirmed that sarcoma-derived iPSCs expressed similar levels of EWS/ATF1 with control ESCs and ETF-iPSCs (ear-tip fibroblast-iPSCs) upon Dox exposure (Supplementary Fig. 2c).
Notably, upon Dox administration, sarcoma-iPSC chimeric mice developed sarcomas much earlier than ESC- and ETF-iPSC-derived chimeric mice (Fig. 1e, f and Table 1). Histological features of secondary sarcomas in the sarcoma-iPSC mice were similar to those of both primary sarcomas and human CCSs (Fig. 1g). Furthermore, cell proliferative activity was not significantly altered in secondary sarcomas (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 2d). In sarcoma-iPSC mice, EWS/ATF1 induction resulted in microscopic sarcoma formation in 90% of mice (9/10) and macroscopic sarcoma development in 40% of mice (4/10) within 2 weeks (Fig. 1h and Table 1). In sharp contrast, 2 weeks treatment with Dox for both ESC-derived and ETF-iPSC-derived chimeric mice resulted in no macroscopic sarcoma formation (0/12 and 0/11, respectively), and only a few mice developed microscopic sarcomas (1/12 in ESC mice and 1/11 in ETF-iPSC mice) (Fig. 1h and Table 1). These results are consistent with a previous melanoma cloning study by somatic cell nuclear transfer, in which melanoma-derived chimeric mice developed secondary melanomas with shorter latency13. In contrast, sarcoma-iPSC mice that were not given Dox were vigorous and did not develop any CCS-like sarcomas even at 6 months of age (n = 7), except for one mouse that developed EWS/ATF1-independent rhabdomyosarcoma (Supplementary Fig. 2e, f). We also established an iPSC line (sarcoma-iPSC-K11) from an independent sarcoma cell line (K11) and confirmed the rapid secondary sarcoma development in the sarcoma-iPSC chimeric mice (Fig. 1i and Supplementary Fig. 2g). Collectively, we established a one-step in vivo cancer model using sarcoma-derived iPSCs.
Table 1.
Coat color H: >60%; M: 30–60%; L: <30% | EWS/ATF1 induction (weeks) | Microscopic tumor | Macroscopic tumor | Location of tumors | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESC chimeric mice | |||||
#3–8 | H | 1 | – | – | |
#2–7 | H | 1 | – | – | |
#2–8 | H | 1 | – | – | |
#3–5 | H | 1 | – | – | |
#3–6 | H | 1 | – | – | |
#3–7 | H | 1 | – | – | |
#2–5 | H | 2 | – | – | |
#2–9 | M | 2 | – | – | |
#2–10 | H | 2 | – | – | |
#2–11 | M | 2 | – | – | |
#2–14 | M | 2 | – | – | |
#2–6 | H | 2 | + | – | Eye |
#2–3 | L | 4 | – | – | |
#3–3 | L | 4 | – | – | |
#3–4 | H | 4 | – | – | |
#2–18 | L | 4 | – | – | |
#2–19 | L | 4 | – | – | |
#2–13 | L | 4 | + | – | Abdominal wall |
#2–17 | L | 4 | + | – | Subcutaneous tissue |
#2–4 | M | 4 | + | + | Chest wall |
#2–12 | M | 8 | + | + | Chest wall |
#2–15 | M | 8 | + | + | Chest wall |
#2–16 | M | 8 | + | + | Chest wall abdominal wall |
#2-1 | H | 12 | – | – | |
#2-2 | H | 12 | – | – | |
#3-1 | L | 12 | – | – | |
#3-2 | L | 12 | – | – | |
7/27 | 4/27 | ||||
ETF-iPSC chimeric mice | |||||
109 #1-1 | M | 1 | – | – | |
109 #1–2 | M | 1 | – | – | |
109 #1–3 | L | 1 | – | – | |
112 #1–4 | H | 1 | – | – | |
112 #1–5 | M | 1 | – | – | |
112 #1–6 | M | 1 | – | – | |
109 #1–7 | H | 2 | – | – | |
109 #1–8 | M | 2 | – | – | |
109 #1–11 | M | 2 | – | – | |
112 #1–2 | L | 2 | – | – | |
112 #1-1 | M | 2 | + | – | Eye |
109 #1–5 | L | 4 | – | – | |
109 #1–6 | L | 4 | – | – | |
112 #7-1 | M | 4 | – | – | |
109 #1–4 | L | 4 | + | – | Abdominal fascia |
112 #1–3 | L | 4 | + | – | Subcutaneous tissue |
109 #1–9 | L | 8 | – | – | |
109 #1–10 | M | 8 | – | – | |
112 #1–8 | L | 8 | – | – | |
112 #1–9 | L | 8 | – | – | |
112 #1–7 | L | 8 | – | – | |
112 #7-2 | L | 8 | – | – | |
109 #1–12 | L | 12 | – | – | |
109 #1–13 | L | 12 | – | – | |
3/24 | 0/24 | ||||
Sarcoma-iPSC chimeric mice | |||||
#3 6-3 | M | 1 | – | – | |
#3 6-2 | M | 1 | + | – | Abdominal wall |
#3 4-2 | H | 1 | + | – | Subcutaneous tissue |
#3 5-4 | M | 1 | + | – | Abdominal wall |
#3 6-1 | M | 1 | + | – | Abdominal wall |
#3 3-1 | H | 1 | + | + | Chest wall abdominal wall eye |
#3 10-1 | H | 1 | + | + | Abdominal wall eye |
#3 5-3 | H | 1 | + | + | Eye subscapula |
#3 2-1 | H | 2 | + | – | Peri-rib |
#3 6-4 | L | 2 | + | + | Abdominal wall |
#1 2-1 | L | 4 | + | + | Eye subcutaneous fascia |
1 2-2 | L | 4 | + | + | Eye |
#1 1-1 | M | 8 | – | – | |
#1 1-3 | L | 8 | – | – | |
#3 5-1 | M | 8 | – | – | |
#3 6-5 | L | 8 | – | – | |
#3 7-1 | M | 8 | – | – | |
#1 2-3 | L | 8 | + | + | Eye |
#1 1-2 | L | 8 | + | + | Eye subcutaneous tissue gastric wall |
#3 5-2 | L | 8 | + | + | Abdominal wall peri-rib eye |
#3 7-2 | M | 8 | + | + | Achilles tendon eye abdominal wall mammary gland |
#3 1-1 | M | 12 | – | – | |
#3 4-3 | L | 12 | – | – | |
15/23 | 10/23 |
ESC embryonic stem cell, ETF ear-tip fibroblast, iPSC induced pluripotent stem cell
Cell-type-specific development of secondary sarcomas
Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that EWS/ATF1 is expressed in various organs and tissues of sarcoma-iPSC mice after Dox treatment (day 5, Supplementary Fig. 3a). Notably, EWS/ATF1 expression induced secondary sarcomas preferentially at the soft tissues, such as fascia, subcutaneous tissue, tissue adjacent to the tendon, and soft tissue outside the eyeballs (Figs. 1e, f, 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3b). However, despite EWS/ATF1 expression in a wide variety of organs, such as the intestine, liver, and skin, EWS/ATF1 did not induce abnormal proliferation in the cells of these tissues (day 5, Fig. 2b). In contrast, we observed proliferating cells in the soft tissue immediately after Dox treatment (day 5, Supplementary Fig. 3c, d), indicating that the initiation of abnormal growth is dependent on cell type.
We next asked why EWS/ATF1 expression fails to induce cancer development in most cell types. It has been shown that oncogene expression in somatic cells results in oncogene-induced senescence (OIS), which prevents cancer development14,15. First, we examined p53 and p21 expression, a representative OIS marker16, in multiple organs of sarcoma-iPSC mice after Dox treatment for 5 days. Notably, an increased number of both p53- and p21-expressing cells was detectable in accordance with cells expressing EWS/ATF1 in multiple organs at day 5 (Fig. 2c, d), suggesting that OIS occurs in most cell types in sarcoma-iPSC mice.
To further investigate the effect of EWS/ATF1 expression on OIS in sarcoma-iPSC-derived differentiated cells, we established mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from sarcoma-iPSC chimeric embryos, which was followed by puromycin selection. We found that the sarcoma-iPSC MEFs harbor genetic aberrations, including a part of chromosomal abnormalities and mutations at Plekhg5 and Alk, which are identical to those in the secondary sarcomas (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Notably, in sharp contrast to the active proliferation of EWS/ATF1-expressing sarcoma cells, EWS/ATF1-expressing sarcoma-iPSC MEFs ceased growth and changed morphology into a large and flat shape (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 4b–d). The senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA β-gal)-positive cell ratio was significantly higher in EWS/ATF1-expressing MEFs than in non-expressing MEFs (Fig. 3b), suggesting that EWS/ATF1 induces premature senescence in sarcoma-iPSC MEFs. Consistently, EWS/ATF1 induced the expression of Ink4a, Arf, and Cdkn1a (p21) in sarcoma-iPSC MEFs (Fig. 3c). Moreover, knockdown of Trp53 rescued the growth arrest phenotype (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 4e), which supports our conclusion that EWS/ATF1 induces OIS in sarcoma-iPSC MEFs.
Conversely, SA β-gal-positive cells were increased by the withdrawal of EWS/ATF1 in sarcoma cells (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, Ink4a and Arf expressions were rapidly increased after the withdrawal of EWS/ATF1 in sarcoma cells (Fig. 3f), demonstrating that EWS/ATF1 expression actively prevents senescence in sarcoma cells. Consistent with the opposing effects of EWS/ATF1 expression on senescence, Il-6, a senescence-associated secretory phenotype-associated gene was inversely regulated in sarcoma cells and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs (Supplementary Fig. 4f). Collectively, our results indicate that sarcoma-iPSC mice develop secondary sarcomas in a cell-type-dependent manner that is associated with the opposing senescence response to EWS/ATF1. These results also suggest that cancer-related genetic abnormalities are not sufficient for senescence escape or eventual sarcoma development in most cell types in this model.
Abnormal cell proliferation starts in peripheral nerves
Taking advantage of the one-step and cell-type-specific nature of secondary sarcoma development in sarcoma-iPSC mice, we next attempted to identify a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. Histological analysis of sarcoma-iPSC mice shortly after EWS/ATF1 induction revealed that the abnormal cell growth often starts around the center of the abdominal wall (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 3c). Therefore, we next performed detailed sequential histological analysis of the abdominal wall after EWS/ATF1 induction in sarcoma-iPSC mice together with ESC- and ETF-iPSC-derived mice. We noticed that invasive cancer cell growth often starts along the course of the peripheral nerves in the soft tissue and muscle tissue (Fig. 4a). Some early microscopic lesions resided inside the peripheral nerves and showed bundle-like patterns (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). We also observed microscopic sarcoma development in the gastric wall, which mimics CCS of the gastrointestinal tract in humans (n = 1/23, Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 5c)17, and in the mammary gland (n = 1/23). Consistent with the notion that EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas arise from peripheral nerve cells, the early lesions express S100 protein (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5a). We also found that EWS/ATF1-induced sarcoma cell lines express several Schwann cell marker genes such as P75NTR, S100b, Mbp, Plp1, and Pmp22 in vitro (Fig. 4d). These results suggest that S100-expressing peripheral nerve cells contain a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas.
Schwann cell-related expression profiles in human CCSs
It has been reported that human CCSs harbor shared properties with malignant melanomas6. Consistently, previous studies demonstrated a similarity in the global gene expression patterns of CCSs and malignant melanomas18. However, we observed that abnormal cell growth often starts along the course of peripheral nerves. Additionally, we found that EWS/ATF1-induced mouse tumors and human CCSs often express Schwann cell markers (Supplementary Fig. 5d). Together, these findings raised the possibility that peripheral nerve cells are a cell of origin for CCSs.
A previous study suggested that EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas arise from neural crest derivatives9. Given that key driver oncogene expression represses the differentiation properties of cell of origin, we next examined the expression of marker genes of neural crest derivatives after EWS/ATF1 knockdown in human CCSs (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 5e–g). EWS/ATF1 knockdown led to a significant upregulation of melanocyte-related genes, such as TYR, MITF, and DCT. However, we also found that a majority of Schwann cell-related genes were similarly upregulated by EWS/ATF1 knockdown in human CCS cells, suggesting that CCSs harbor transcriptional signatures of both melanocytes and Schwann cells.
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a Schwann cell-derived sarcoma that preferentially occurs in neurofibromatosis type1 patients19. Of note, both clustering analysis and principal component analysis using microarray data revealed that most CCSs resemble more MPNSTs than malignant melanomas (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 5h). Moreover, the genes upregulated (n = 264 probe sets) and downregulated (n = 122 probe sets) in MPNSTs compared to malignant melanomas were similarly upregulated and downregulated in CCSs, respectively (Fig. 4g). Collectively, our results indicate that human CCSs exhibit shared properties with Schwann cells in the peripheral nerves and Schwann cell-derived sarcomas.
Neural crest-derived nerve cells are a cell of origin
We next employed a genetic approach to determine a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. For this purpose, Cre or CreERT2 (or CreER) transgene driven by a cell-type-specific promoter was combined with Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP (LSL)-rtTA3 allele and Col1a1:: tetO-EWS/ATF1 to induce EWS/ATF1 upon Dox exposure in a cell-type-specific manner (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 5i). Mpz-Cre allele was used for EWS/ATF1 induction in neural crest derivatives. Similarly, we used Tyr-CreER allele for the induction in melanocytes and Sox10-CreERT2 allele (Supplementary Fig. 5j) for immature neural crest derivatives as well as melanocytes and Schwann cells. Additionally, Krox20-Cre allele was utilized to induce EWS/ATF1 in Schwann cells. After treatment with Dox for 3 months, we found that mice containing Mpz-Cre allele developed CCS-like sarcomas, indicating that neural crest-derived cells are a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas (Fig. 4i, j). However, other Cre alleles failed to induce sarcomas (Fig. 4i), suggesting that cells expressing well-established markers for differentiated neural crest derivatives do not give rise to sarcomas after EWS/ATF1 induction.
Tppp3 is a candidate marker for a cell of origin of the sarcoma
We therefore hypothesized that unclassified neural crest derivatives in peripheral nerves may be a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. Accordingly, we next searched for candidate genes that are expressed in cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. For identification of the candidate genes, we used the following criteria: (1) genes that increase upon nerve cell differentiation, (2) genes that are expressed in nerve cells, but not in melanocytes. Given that cancer cells often recover the original cell properties by inhibition of key oncogenic signals, we also extract (3) genes that increase upon EWS/ATF1 withdrawal in mouse CCS cells (G1297). According to published microarray data20,21, we extracted 393 genes, which were highly expressed in mature sciatic nerves (4 months of age) compared to immature sciatic nerve (5 days of age) (criterion 1) (cut-off fold change; 4-fold), and 553 genes that are highly expressed in mature sciatic nerves compared to melanocytes (criterion 2) (cut-off fold change; 10-fold). We also extracted 86 genes that increase after withdrawal of EWS/ATF1 expression in sarcoma cells (G1297) (criterion 3) (cut-off fold change; 5-fold) (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6a). Finally, four overlapping genes in three criteria were regarded as candidate marker genes for cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. Among four candidate genes, we focused on Tppp3 since remarkable increment of TPPP3 expression was observed by knockdown of EWS/ATF1 in human CCS cell line (MP-CCS-SY) (Fig. 5b).
Tppp3 is expressed in peripheral nerve cells of adult mice
Tppp3 is a tubulin polymerization-promoting protein family member 3 gene and is expressed in developing tendon sheath in the embryonic stage22. To determine the Tppp3 expression pattern in adult tissues, we next established Tppp3-EGFP reporter knock-in mice (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 6b). Tppp3 was expressed in bronchial epithelial cells of the lung (Fig. 5d) and squamous epithelium of the esophagus, which is consistent with the LacZ expression pattern in the KOMP expression atlas for Tppp3 (https://www.kompphenotype.org/). Notably, Tppp3 was also expressed in a subset of cells inside peripheral nerves of the subcutaneous tissues, which also expressed S100 (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 6c), but were not merged with Sox10 (Fig. 5e). S100/Sox10-positive melanocytes in hair follicles were negative for the reporter (Fig. 5e), affirming that Tppp3 is highly expressed in peripheral nerve cells compared with melanocytes in adult mice. Tppp3 expression was also observed at peripheral nerves in the muscle tissue (Fig. 5f) and the enteric nerve cells (Fig. 5g). Notably, Sox10-expressing migrating neural crest cells and dorsal root ganglion cells at E12.5 were not stained with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (Fig. 5h), suggesting that Tppp3 is not expressed in early derivatives of neural crest.
To further investigate the distribution of adult Tppp3-expressing cells in subcutaneous tissue, we established reporter mice harboring Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP (LSL)-LacZ23 and Tppp3-CreERT2 (Rosa26Stop-LacZ/Tppp3CreERT2) (Fig. 5i and Supplementary Fig. 6d). Four-week-old Rosa26Stop-LacZ/Tppp3CreERT2 mice were treated with tamoxifen and sacrificed 4 weeks later. Consistent with the results in Tppp3-EGFP reporter mice, bronchial epithelial cells of the lung exhibit LacZ staining (Fig. 5j), while S100-expressing hair follicle cells did not express LacZ (Fig. 5k). Notably, LacZ staining was detectable in a small subset of S100-expressing peripheral nerve cells in both soft tissue and muscle tissue, which corresponds with the location of the initial abnormal cell growth in sarcoma-iPSC mice (Fig. 4a). LacZ-positive cells were also observed in the perimysium that surrounds muscle fibers (Fig. 5l).
Tppp3-expressing cells as a cell of origin of the sarcoma
To examine whether Tppp3-expressing cells can give rise to EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas, we established compound transgenic mice that harbor Tppp3-CreERT2 allele together with Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP (LSL)-rtTA3 allele and Col1a1:: tetO-EWS/ATF1, in which EWS/ATF1 can be induced with Dox exclusively in Tppp3-expressing cells after tamoxifen treatment (Fig. 6a). Notably, these mice developed CCS-like sarcomas after Dox treatment for 3 months (5/14) (Fig. 6b). To further confirm that Tppp3-expressing cells give rise to sarcomas, we also generated mice harboring Tppp3-CreERT2 allele and Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP (LSL)-EWS/ATF1 allele (Rosa26Stop-E/A/Tppp3CreERT2) in which EWS/ATF1 can be induced in Tppp3-expressing cells upon tamoxifen treatment (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. 6e, f). We also generated transgenic mice containing Sox10-CreERT2 alleles (Rosa26Stop-E/A/Sox10CreERT2), where EWS/ATF1 can be induced in Sox10-expressing cells after tamoxifen injection (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. 6f). Notably, CCS-like sarcomas were observed only in mice carrying Rosa26Stop-E/A/Tppp3CreERT2 at 3 months after tamoxifen treatment, while Rosa26Stop-E/A/Sox10CreERT2 mice never developed the sarcomas (Fig. 6d–f). Collectively, we concluded that Tppp3-expressing cells, but not Sox10-expressing cells, are a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas.
Neural crest-derived cells express both Tppp3 and S100b
We found that Tppp3-expressing cells can give rise to sarcomas and early sarcoma lesions often express S100, which suggests that Tppp3/S100-expressing neural crest-derived cells in peripheral nerves are a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. Taking advantage of the taxonomic transcriptome atlas of the mouse nervous system24, we next investigated transcription profiles of Tppp3-expressing peripheral nerve cells. The hierarchical taxonomy based on a single-cell RNA-sequencing revealed the preferential expression of Tppp3 at clusters of neural crest-derived cells in the nervous system (Fig. 6g). Notably, a subset of the Tppp3-expressing clusters expresses S100b. Furthermore, higher levels of Tppp3 were observed in clusters with neuron-like transcription signatures, which do not express Sox10 (Fig. 6g). Consistent with a previous study demonstrating that EWS/ATF1 drives tumorigenesis in the Prx1 lineage10, Tppp3-expressing clusters also expresses Prdx1 (Fig. 6g).
To investigate transcriptional memory of a cell of origin, we next examined the expression pattern of uniquely overexpressed genes in human CCSs and MPNSTs using the taxonomic atlas of the mouse nervous system. Three representative neural crest-derived tumors, CCSs, MPNSTs, and malignant melanomas, were compared to extract uniquely overexpressed genes in CCSs (n = 117; cut-off fold change; 2-fold) and MPNSTs (n = 127; cut-off fold change; 2.5-fold). Notably, expression of MPNST-specific genes, but not CCS-specific genes, was significantly higher in Sox10/Krox20-expressing neural crest-derived cell clusters (Fig. 6g and Supplementary Fig. 6g). These results suggest that MPNSTs, but not CCSs, harbor transcriptional memory of Schwann cells in the peripheral nerves.
Finally, we examined a single-cell transcriptome of a Tppp3-expressing cell. We found that a subset of Tppp3-expressing cells co-expresses genes that are often highly expressed in CCSs at the single-cell level. A Tppp3-expressing cell simultaneously expresses S100b, Ngfr, Pmp22, and Ebf1, whereas Sox10 and Krox20 are hardly expressed in a Tppp3-expressing cell (Fig. 6h). Collectively, we propose that Tppp3-expressing and Sox10/Krox20-negative neural crest-derived peripheral nerve cells are a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas, at least in this transgenic mouse model.
Cell-type-specific binding patterns of EWS/ATF1
We next considered the molecular mechanisms for cell type specificity of sarcoma development. Considering the heterogeneous nature of Tppp3-expressing cells, it seems technically difficult to isolate Tppp3-expressing cells that give rise to the sarcoma. Therefore, we compared sarcoma cells (G1297) and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs, two different cell types that share genetic abnormalities, which are associated with sarcoma development but exhibit opposing senescence responses and cellular kinetics after EWS/ATF1 induction. We first examined the early transcriptional response after EWS/ATF1 induction in the two cell types. Sarcoma cells (G1297, Dox OFF) and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs were harvested at 3, 12, and 48 h after Dox treatment and examined for global gene expressions. Notably, the early transcriptional response was considerably different between sarcoma cells and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs (Fig. 7a). Inversely regulated genes in the two cell types upon EWS/ATF1 induction often contain cell cycle-associated genes, such as Mki67, Ccna2, and Aurka (data not shown), which is consistent with the opposing cellular kinetics after Dox treatment. Notably, we found a global downregulation of histone-coding genes in sarcoma-iPSC MEFs while they were generally upregulated in sarcoma cells upon EWS/ATF1 induction (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Considering that decreased histone levels are implicated in senescence from yeast to mammals25,26, these findings further support our conclusion that EWS/ATF1 induction leads to the opposing responses of senescence in the two different cell types.
Given that EWS/ATF1 affects gene expression via binding to cyclic AMP response element (CRE) of the genome using the DNA-binding domain of ATF18, we compared the distribution of EWS/ATF1 binding in sarcoma cells (G1297) and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs at 12 h after Dox treatment by chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-Seq) analysis. Although there exists common EWS/ATF1 binding sites in the two cell types (n = 5109), we observed unique binding sites in G1297 and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs (n = 2981 and 15601, respectively) (Fig. 7b and Supplementary Fig. 7b, c). Notably, the increased binding of EWS/ATF1 was associated with increased expression in G1297 (Supplementary Fig. 7d). Indeed, consistent with the premature senescence phenotype and the increased expression of Ink4a and Arf in sarcoma-iPSC MEFs, EWS/ATF1 binding was detectable at Cdkn2a locus in sarcoma-iPSC MEFs but not in G1297 (Fig. 7b). Moreover, EWS/ATF1 was enriched at a super-enhancer in G1297 (Supplementary Fig. 7e)27. Together, these results suggest that the cell-type-specific binding of EWS/ATF1 is responsible for the cell-type-specific transcriptional profiling.
H3K27ac-pre-marked regions are targets of EWS/ATF1 binding
We further asked why the EWS/ATF1-binding patterns were different in the two cell types. We focused on H3K27ac, an active epigenetic mark, in sarcoma cells (G1297) and MEFs before EWS/ATF1 induction. ChIP-Seq data for H3K27ac in both Dox OFF sarcoma cells (sarcoma cells without EWS/ATF1 expression) and wild-type MEFs28,29 revealed that EWS/ATF1 was recruited to H3K27-pre-marked regions in both sarcoma cells and sarcoma-iPSC MEFs (Fig. 7c and Supplementary Fig. 7f, g). Furthermore, cell-type-specific binding sites were differentially pre-marked with H3K27ac in the two cell types: in Dox OFF sarcoma cells, sarcoma-specific binding sites were preferentially pre-marked with H3K27ac and less marked at MEF-specific binding sites (Fig. 7d); this relationship was conversed in wild-type MEFs (Fig. 7d). Collectively, these results suggest that EWS/ATF1 binds to genomic regions pre-marked with H3K27ac. However, H3K27ac-pre-marked sites did not always correspond to EWS/ATF1 binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 7b), which presumably reflects the different location of binding sites for the enhancer-related transcription factors (TFs) and ATF1.
EWS/ATF binding in neural crest-related enhancers
An H3K27ac-marked region often corresponds to an enhancer. Given that TFs are involved in the establishment of enhancers, we next tried to identify TFs responsible for cell-type-specific EWS/ATF1 binding. HOMER (Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment)-known motif analysis revealed a list of TF-binding motifs at sarcoma-specific and MEF-specific binding sites (Table 2). We found Creb/Atf and Jun/Fos motifs as the most enriched motifs in both sarcoma-specific and MEF-specific binding sites (Table 2), which is consistent with the fact that EWS/ATF1 binds to the genome through the DNA-binding domain of ATF18. We also observed unique motifs at each binding site. Most notably, the unique enriched motifs at sarcoma-specific binding sites often included motifs of neural crest-related TFs, such as Ebf1, Sox10, and Nur77 (Nr4a1), while those at MEF-specific binding sites included motifs of mesenchymal cell/connective tissue/embryonic tissue-related TFs, such as Runx2, Tead4, and Meis1 (Table 2)30–32. These findings suggest that enhancers of cell of origin are targets of EWS/ATF1 bindings, which may account for the cell-type-specific patterns of EWS/ATF1 bindings.
Table 2.
Sarcoma-specific binding sites | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Name | P value | # Target sequences with motif | % of Targets sequences with motif | # Background sequences with motif | % of Background sequences with motif | Motif |
1 | Atf1(bZIP)/K562-ATF1-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1e-1014 | 2618 | 34.76% | 2802.5 | 7.39% | Atf-related |
2 | Atf7(bZIP)/3T3L1-Atf7-ChIP-Seq(GSE56872)/Homer | 1e-918 | 2141 | 28.43% | 1983.2 | 5.23% | Atf-related |
3 | Atf2(bZIP)/3T3L1-Atf2-ChIP-Seq(GSE56872)/Homer | 1e-849 | 1776 | 23.58% | 1410.8 | 3.72% | Atf-related |
4 | c-Jun-CRE(bZIP)/K562-cJun-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1e-734 | 1580 | 20.98% | 1282.4 | 3.38% | Atf-related |
5 | CRE(bZIP)/Promoter/Homer | 1e-610 | 1238 | 16.44% | 912.8 | 2.41% | Atf-related |
6 | JunD(bZIP)/K562-JunD-ChIP-Seq/Homer | 1e-584 | 902 | 11.98% | 437.6 | 1.15% | Atf-related |
7 | Fra1(bZIP)/BT549-Fra1-ChIP-Seq(GSE46166)/Homer | 1e-414 | 1582 | 21.00% | 2270.4 | 5.99% | Atf-related |
8 | AP1(bZIP)/ThioMac-PU.1-ChIP-Seq(GSE21512)/Homer | 1e-411 | 1882 | 24.99% | 3136.4 | 8.27% | Atf-related |
9 | Atf3(bZIP)/GBM-ATF3-ChIP-Seq(GSE33912)/Homer | 1e-406 | 1730 | 22.97% | 2719.3 | 7.17% | Atf-related |
10 | BATF(bZIP)/Th17-BATF-ChIP-Seq(GSE39756)/Homer | 1e-403 | 1726 | 22.92% | 2720 | 7.17% | Atf-related |
11 | Fosl2(bZIP)/3T3L1-Fosl2-ChIP-Seq(GSE56872)/Homer | 1e-352 | 1143 | 15.18% | 1396 | 3.68% | Atf-related |
12 | Jun-AP1(bZIP)/K562-cJun-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1.00E-287 | 881 | 11.70% | 1007.1 | 2.66% | Atf-related |
13 | EBF(EBF)/proBcell-EBF-ChIP-Seq(GSE21978)/Homer | 1.00E-126 | 412 | 5.47% | 489.1 | 1.29% | Sarcoma-specific |
14 | Bach2(bZIP)/OCILy7-Bach2-ChIP-Seq(GSE44420)/Homer | 1.00E-105 | 507 | 6.73% | 823.9 | 2.17% | |
15 | EBF1(EBF)/Near-E2A-ChIP-Seq(GSE21512)/Homer | 1.00E-100 | 1072 | 14.23% | 2697.6 | 7.11% | Sarcoma-specific |
16 | Chop(bZIP)/MEF-Chop-ChIP-Seq(GSE35681)/Homer | 1.00E-95 | 466 | 6.19% | 762.9 | 2.01% | |
17 | Atf4(bZIP)/MEF-Atf4-ChIP-Seq(GSE35681)/Homer | 1.00E-90 | 527 | 7.00% | 970.4 | 2.56% | Atf-related |
18 | Nkx6.1(Homeobox)/Islet-Nkx6.1-ChIP-Seq(GSE40975)/Homer | 1.00E-69 | 2961 | 39.31% | 11288.6 | 29.77% | Sarcoma-specific |
19 | Lhx2(Homeobox)/HFSC-Lhx2-ChIP-Seq(GSE48068)/Homer | 1.00E-64 | 1362 | 18.08% | 4319.5 | 11.39% | Sarcoma-specific |
20 | Foxo1(Forkhead)/RAW-Foxo1-ChIP-Seq/Homer | 1.00E-62 | 1985 | 26.35% | 7022.5 | 18.52% | Sarcoma-specific |
21 | CEBP:AP1(bZIP)/ThioMac-CEBPb-ChIP-Seq(GSE21512)/Homer | 1.00E-60 | 928 | 12.32% | 2659 | 7.01% | Atf-related |
22 | FOXP1(Forkhead)/H9-FOXP1-ChIP-Seq(GSE31006)/Homer | 1.00E-52 | 612 | 8.13% | 1576.7 | 4.16% | Sarcoma-specific |
23 | NF1-halfsite(CTF)/LNCaP-NF1-ChIP-Seq(Unpublished)/Homer | 1.00E-48 | 1655 | 21.97% | 5889.6 | 15.53% | |
24 | MafA(bZIP)/Islet-MafA-ChIP-Seq(GSE30298)/Homer | 1.00E-40 | 1027 | 13.64% | 3381.4 | 8.92% | |
25 | FOXA1(Forkhead)/LNCAP-FOXA1-ChIP-Seq(GSE27824)/Homer | 1.00E-38 | 1384 | 18.37% | 4938.6 | 13.02% | Sarcoma-specific |
26 | Sox10(HMG)/SciaticNerve-Sox3-ChIP-Seq(GSE35132)/Homer | 1.00E-34 | 1664 | 22.09% | 6300.6 | 16.62% | Sarcoma-specific |
27 | Nur77(NR)/K562-NR4A1-ChIP-Seq(GSE31363)/Homer | 1.00E-33 | 276 | 3.66% | 607.9 | 1.60% | Sarcoma-specific |
28 | MITF(bHLH)/MastCells-MITF-ChIP-Seq(GSE48085)/Homer | 1.00E-31 | 1187 | 15.76% | 4275 | 11.27% | |
29 | Lhx3(Homeobox)/Neuron-Lhx3-ChIP-Seq(GSE31456)/Homer | 1.00E-30 | 1778 | 23.61% | 6933.2 | 18.29% | Sarcoma-specific |
30 | FOXA1(Forkhead)/MCF7-FOXA1-ChIP-Seq(GSE26831)/Homer | 1.00E-30 | 1125 | 14.94% | 4027.9 | 10.62% | Sarcoma-specific |
MEF-specific binding sites | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Name | P value | # Target sequences with motif | % of Targets sequences with motif | # Background sequences with motif | % of Background sequences with motif | |
1 | Atf7(bZIP)/3T3L1-Atf7-ChIP-Seq(GSE56872)/Homer | 1e-2516 | 6796 | 26.36% | 1306.8 | 5.63% | Atf-related |
2 | Atf1(bZIP)/K562-ATF1-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1e-2430 | 7999 | 31.03% | 1895.2 | 8.16% | Atf-related |
3 | Atf2(bZIP)/3T3L1-Atf2-ChIP-Seq(GSE56872)/Homer | 1e-2415 | 5702 | 22.12% | 928.2 | 4.00% | Atf-related |
4 | c-Jun-CRE(bZIP)/K562-cJun-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1e-2145 | 5184 | 20.11% | 858.6 | 3.70% | Atf-related |
5 | JunD(bZIP)/K562-JunD-ChIP-Seq/Homer | 1e-1716 | 2922 | 11.34% | 294.1 | 1.27% | Atf-related |
6 | Atf3(bZIP)/GBM-ATF3-ChIP-Seq(GSE33912)/Homer | 1e-1382 | 5991 | 23.24% | 1705.1 | 7.34% | Atf-related |
7 | BATF(bZIP)/Th17-BATF-ChIP-Seq(GSE39756)/Homer | 1e-1367 | 6005 | 23.30% | 1726.5 | 7.43% | Atf-related |
8 | Fra1(bZIP)/BT549-Fra1-ChIP-Seq(GSE46166)/Homer | 1e-1345 | 5400 | 20.95% | 1438 | 6.19% | Atf-related |
9 | AP1(bZIP)/ThioMac-PU.1-ChIP-Seq(GSE21512)/Homer | 1e-1309 | 6409 | 24.86% | 1996.5 | 8.60% | Atf-related |
10 | CRE(bZIP)/Promoter/Homer | 1e-1193 | 3207 | 12.44% | 575.2 | 2.48% | Atf-related |
11 | Fosl2(bZIP)/3T3L1-Fosl2-ChIP-Seq(GSE56872)/Homer | 1e-1052 | 3678 | 14.27% | 853 | 3.67% | Atf-related |
12 | Jun-AP1(bZIP)/K562-cJun-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1e-922 | 2881 | 11.18% | 596.2 | 2.57% | Atf-related |
13 | Bach2(bZIP)/OCILy7-Bach2-ChIP-Seq(GSE44420)/Homer | 1e-387 | 1701 | 6.60% | 459.1 | 1.98% | |
14 | Chop(bZIP)/MEF-Chop-ChIP-Seq(GSE35681)/Homer | 1.00E-297 | 1603 | 6.22% | 497.1 | 2.14% | |
15 | Atf4(bZIP)/MEF-Atf4-ChIP-Seq(GSE35681)/Homer | 1.00E-271 | 1769 | 6.86% | 615.5 | 2.65% | Atf-related |
16 | CEBP:AP1(bZIP)/ThioMac-CEBPb-ChIP-Seq(GSE21512)/Homer | 1.00E-189 | 3147 | 12.21% | 1642.2 | 7.07% | Atf-related |
17 | RUNX-AML(Runt)/CD4 + -PolII-ChIP-Seq/Homer | 1.00E-182 | 3251 | 12.61% | 1732.1 | 7.46% | MEF-specific |
18 | RUNX(Runt)/HPC7-Runx1-ChIP-Seq(GSE22178)/Homer | 1.00E-126 | 3229 | 12.53% | 1891.4 | 8.14% | MEF-specific |
19 | NF-E2(bZIP)/K562-NF-E2-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1.00E-111 | 507 | 1.97% | 139.8 | 0.60% | MEF-specific |
20 | RUNX1(Runt)/Jurkat-RUNX1-ChIP-Seq(GSE29180)/Homer | 1.00E-109 | 4110 | 15.94% | 2629 | 11.32% | MEF-specific |
21 | TEAD(TEA)/Fibroblast-PU.1-ChIP-Seq(Unpublished)/Homer | 1.00E-108 | 2673 | 10.37% | 1546.3 | 6.66% | MEF-specific |
22 | RUNX2(Runt)/PCa-RUNX2-ChIP-Seq(GSE33889)/Homer | 1.00E-106 | 3823 | 14.83% | 2419.9 | 10.42% | MEF-specific |
23 | Bach1(bZIP)/K562-Bach1-ChIP-Seq(GSE31477)/Homer | 1.00E-103 | 477 | 1.85% | 132.4 | 0.57% | MEF-specific |
24 | Nrf2(bZIP)/Lymphoblast-Nrf2-ChIP-Seq(GSE37589)/Homer | 1.00E-97 | 452 | 1.75% | 126.4 | 0.54% | MEF-specific |
25 | MafA(bZIP)/Islet-MafA-ChIP-Seq(GSE30298)/Homer | 1.00E-93 | 3410 | 13.23% | 2158.3 | 9.29% | |
26 | TEAD4(TEA)/Tropoblast-Tead4-ChIP-Seq(GSE37350)/Homer | 1.00E-88 | 3115 | 12.08% | 1954.8 | 8.42% | MEF-specific |
27 | Meis1(Homeobox)/MastCells-Meis1-ChIP-Seq(GSE48085)/Homer | 1.00E-84 | 6677 | 25.90% | 4835.6 | 20.82% | MEF-specific |
28 | MITF(bHLH)/MastCells-MITF-ChIP-Seq(GSE48085)/Homer | 1.00E-75 | 3891 | 15.09% | 2623.1 | 11.30% | |
29 | NF1(CTF)/LNCAP-NF1-ChIP-Seq(Unpublished)/Homer | 1.00E-65 | 1052 | 4.08% | 536.5 | 2.31% | |
30 | Tbx20(T-box)/Heart-Tbx20-ChIP-Seq(GSE29636)/Homer | 1.00E-64 | 1069 | 4.15% | 549.7 | 2.37% | MEF-specific |
Motifs appearing in sarcoma-specific and MEF-specific EWS/ATF1 binding sites are shown
MEF mouse embryonic fibroblasts, ChIP-seq chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing, CRE cyclic AMP response element, HOMER (Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment)
Epigenetic silencing induces growth arrest in sarcoma cells
Our cell-type-specific sarcoma model demonstrated that cancer genome requires specific cellular context to exert cancer properties, and suggested that enhancers in a cell of origin affect the genomic binding sites of key oncogenic proteins. Finally, we tried to alter the cancer cell fate by modulating the cell-type-specific binding pattern of EWS/ATF1. The Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) is a transcriptional repressor domain that interacts with histone deacetylase and induces epigenetic silencing33. Therefore, we attempted to induce silencing at sarcoma-specific EWS/ATF1 binding sites in sarcoma cells by overexpressing KRAB-fused Ebf1, since the Ebf1 motif is the most abundant motif among sarcoma-specific motifs for EWS/ATF1 binding (Table 2). Notably, the introduction of the Ebf1-KRAB fusion gene resulted in remarkable growth inhibition of sarcoma cells, whereas the transduction of control KRAB fusion genes did not inhibit the growth of sarcoma cells (Fig. 7e and Supplementary Fig. 8a). Importantly, knockdown of Ebf1 did not affect sarcoma cell growth (Supplementary Fig. 8b), suggesting that enhancer activity at Ebf1 binding sites, but not Ebf1 expression itself, has an impact on the growth of sarcoma cells. Consistent with this, human CCS cell line MP-CCS-SY exhibited growth inhibition upon the transduction of KRAB genes fused with SOX10 and BRN2, both of which are important TFs for neural crest cell differentiation34,35 (Supplementary Fig. 8c).
Mechanistically, we found that Ebf1-KRAB-expressing sarcoma cells exhibit a reduced enrichment of EWS/ATF1 at the super-enhancer when compared with the control NANOG-KRAB-expressing sarcoma cells (Fig. 7f). Moreover, consistent with our finding that EWS/ATF1 actively prevents premature senescence in sarcoma cells, SA β-gal-positive cells were increased in Ebf1-KRAB-expressing sarcoma cells (Fig. 7g). Consistently, Cdkn1a and Ink4a, as well as Il-6, were upregulated in Ebf1-KRAB-expressing sarcoma cells when compared with control NANOG-KRAB-expressing sarcoma cells (Supplementary Fig. 8d).
Finally, we tested the effect of pharmacologic inhibition of the super-enhancer in CCS cells using BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1. Notably, both mouse and human CCS cells showed reduced cell growth by JQ1 treatment in vitro (Fig. 7h, i), whereas the effect was not obvious in Ewing sarcomas that harbor EWS/FLI1 fusion oncogene (Supplementary Fig. 8e, f). The inhibitory effect of JQ1 treatment on CCS cell growth was confirmed in a xenograft model of human CCS cells (Fig. 7j). Altogether, these results demonstrate that enhancers of cell of origin play an important role in both the development and maintenance of CCS, suggesting that they could make a promising therapeutic target.
Discussion
Here we showed that sarcoma-iPSC mice exhibit extremely short latency for secondary sarcoma development after induction of the key driver oncogene. The fact that invasive growth starts as early as 5 days in a cellular context-dependent manner indicates that somatic cells with particular epigenetic regulation immediately turn into cancer cells in this model. Considering that most in vivo solid cancer models require considerable latency for cancer development, this model should provide a unique tool for studying many aspects of cancer biology. Indeed, taking advantage of the model, we here propose that Tppp3-expressing neural crest-derived cells are a cell of origin for mouse CCS cells and epigenetic regulation at the cell of origin affects the binding patterns of a key driver oncogenic protein, which leads to the establishment of a sarcoma-specific super-enhancer. Our results suggest that the epigenetic regulation of cell of origin may primarily play a critical role in the development and maintenance of cancer cells.
Genetic mutation of either p53 or Ink4a/Arf locus bypasses the premature senescence induced by oncogenic Ras, demonstrating that genetic aberration is causative of the escape from senescence. Notably, we here show that sarcoma-iPSC mice immediately develop secondary sarcomas from peripheral nerve cells, but exhibit premature senescence in other tissues upon the induction of EWS/ATF1. Although the mechanism by which Tppp3-expressing cells can escape from senescence remains unclear, our results suggest that the escape from premature senescence is mediated by the cellular context with distinct enhancer landscapes, which highlights the impact of cell-type-related epigenetic regulation in cancer development. Consistent with this, we demonstrated that epigenetic silencing at cell-type-specific enhancers promotes premature senescence and induces a growth arrest phenotype in sarcoma cells. We propose that epigenetic regulations of the cell of origin could be targets for modulating cancer cell fate. Considering that key oncogenic signals often use TFs as effectors of the signal transduction, our findings might provide a general basis for cell type specificity in cancer development.
It is noteworthy that EWS/ATF1induced sarcomas from Tppp3-expressing neural crest-derived cells in peripheral nerves. A previous proteome analysis demonstrated that Tppp3 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression levels increase upon peripheral nerve cell differentiation, suggesting that more mature peripheral nerve cells express Tppp320,36. Conversely, in the present study, EWS/ATF1 expression failed to transform Sox10- and Knox20-expressing Schwann cells, which suggests that Tppp3-expressing cells may be a specialized differentiated cell type of neural crest-derived peripheral nerve cells. Notably, a single-cell transcriptome of a Tppp3-expressing cell revealed that a subset of a Tppp3-expressing cells simultaneously expresses S100b, Ngfr, Pmp22, and Ebf1, which are often highly expressed in CCSs, whereas Sox10 and Krox20 are hardly expressed in the Tppp3-expressing cell. Taken together, we propose that Tppp3-expressing and Sox10-negative neural crest-derived peripheral nerve cells are a cell of origin for EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas. However, it should be noted that CCSs frequently express well-characterized markers of both Schwann cells and melanocytes, including SOX10 and TYR. Notably, the taxonomic transcriptome atlas of the mouse nervous system suggested that oligodendrocytes express genes characteristic in neural crest-derived cells such as Sox10, which raised the possibility that reprogramming into neural crest-like state could occur even in non-neural crest derivatives24. It is possible that such reprogramming is associated with the expression of characteristic genes in a wide range of neural crest derivatives in CCSs10.
In summary, we established a cell-type-specific one-step in vivo sarcoma model using sarcoma-iPSCs. Using this unique cancer model, we determined Tppp3-expressing peripheral nerve cells as an origin of EWS/ATF1-induced sarcomas, provided insights into the cell type specificity for cancer development (Fig. 8).
Methods
Vector construction and gene targeting
To target Rosa26-stop-EWS/ATF1 and Rosa26-stop-rtTA3-ires-Venus alleles, EWS/ATF1-FLAG-HA and rtTA3-ires-Venus cassettes were inserted into a targeting vector (pRosa26-DEST; obtained from Addgene)37. For the Sox10-CreERT2, Tppp3-CreERT2, and Tppp3-EGFP knock-in system, the Red/ET bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) recombination system was used to introduce an ires-CreERT2 or EGFP-pA-rox-PGK-EM7-BsdR-pA-rox cassette into 3′-UTR of Sox10 BAC or Tppp3 BAC, and targeting vectors with a DT-A-negative selection cassette were generated from these BACs. The obtained vectors were electropolated to V6.5 ESCs. ESCs were cultured with ES media containing 350 µg/ml G418 (Nacalai) or 15 µg/ml blasticidin S (Bsd, Funakoshi). Drug-resistant colonies were picked up and expanded. Correctly targeted ES clones were confirmed by Southern blotting. To generate Rosa-M2rtTA; Col1a1::tetO- EWS/ATF1-ires-mCherry ESCs, the EWS/ATF1-FLAG-HA-ires-mCherry-pA sequence was inserted into pBS31, which was electropolated into KH2 ESCs38. The established ESCs were used to generate chimeric mice by blastocyst injection.
Cell lines
Mouse CCS cell lines (G1297, K11) were established from EWS/ATF1-inducible mice9. MP-CCS-SY and KAS are human CCS cell lines carrying EWS/ATF1 type 1 and type 2, respectively. MP-CCS-SY was provided by H. Moritake (University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan)39 and KAS was provided by T. Nakamura (Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan). The mouse Ewing sarcoma cell line (SCOS) was established from EWS/FLI1-inducible mice40. A673 was obtained from ATCC. TC135 was provided by Dr. T.J. Triche41. Cells were regularly checked for mycoplasma contamination (e-Myco Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit, Life Diagnostics).
In vivo experiment
All animal experiments were approved by the CiRA Animal Experiment Committee and IMSUT Animal Experiment Committee, and the care of the animals was in accordance with institutional guidelines. EWS/ATF1-inducible mice were treated with 200 μg/ml Dox-containing water and 10 mg/ml sucrose starting at the age of 4–6 weeks. For the Cre-mediated recombination, intraperitoneal injection of tamoxifen (2–4 mg/day × 2–4 times) was performed for mice harboring the CreERT2 (or CreER) system at 3–4 weeks of age.
For xenograft studies, a total of 3 × 106 sarcoma-derived iPS cells were transplanted to the subcutaneous tissue of NOD/ShiJic-scid Jcl mice (CLEA Japan) or BALB/cSLC-nu/nu mice (Japan SLC) to induce teratomas. MP-CCS-SY xenografts were established by injecting MP-CCS-SY cells (5 × 106) in 30% Matrigel (BD Biosciences) into the flank of 7-week-old female BALB/cSLC-nu/nu nude mice (Japan SLC). One month after injection, mice with measureable tumors were divided into cohorts to be treated with JQ1 at 50 mg kg−1 or vehicle (5:95 = dimethyl sulfoxide:10% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin) once a day for 15 days. Tumor volume was measured and calculated every 3 days.
iPSC derivation and maintenance
iPSC derivation was performed by utilizing retroviral vectors (pMX-OCT3/4, pMX-SOX2, pMX-KLF4, and pMX-cMYC, obtained from Addgene)42. After the transduction of the reprogramming factors, sarcoma cells and ear tip fibroblasts were cultured in ESC media supplemented with human recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) (Wako), 2-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen) and 50 µg/ml l-ascorbic acid (Sigma). The established iPSCs were maintained with ESC media supplemented with LIF, 1 μM PD0325901 (Stemgent), and 3 μM CHIR99021 (Stemgent).
Establishment of sarcoma-iPSC-derived MEFs
After blastocyst injection of sarcoma-derived iPSCs, chimeric embryos were harvested at E13.5, and MEFs were derived from the eviscerated and decapitated embryos with 0.25% trypsin. Because the PGK-Puro-pA selection cassette was placed at the Rosa26M2rtTA knock-in allele38, MEFs were treated with 1 µg/ml puromycin (Sigma) for 1 week, and puromycin-resistant MEFs were used for further experiments.
RT-PCR and real-time quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was extracted by using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen). Up to 1 µg RNA was used for the reverse transcription (RT) reaction into complementary DNA (cDNA). RT-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR were performed using Go-Taq Green Master Mix and Go-Taq qPCR Master Mix (Promega), respectively. Transcript levels were normalized by β-actin (mouse) and GAPDH (human). Ethical approval for the use of human tumor samples was granted by the ethics committee of Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine. All patients who donated tumor samples used in the study provided written, informed consent. PCR primers are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Bisulfite genomic sequencing
Bisulfite treatment was performed using EZ DNA Methylation-Gold KitTM (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplified products were cloned into pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen) and transformed into DH5α. Colonies were randomly selected and sequenced with M13 forward and M13 reverse primers for each gene.
Cell growth assay
Sarcoma cells and MEFs were plated into 12-well culture plates at a density of 8 × 104 cells/well. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and each sample was measured twice. The number of cells was measured by automatic cell counter TC10TM (Bio-Rad). For JQ1-treated cell growth assay, mouse and human clear-cell sarcoma cell lines (G1297, MP-CCS-SY, KAS) and mouse and human Ewing sarcoma cell lines (SCOS, TC135, A673) were plated into 96-well culture plates at density of 1 × 104 cells/well. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and each sample was measured twice. The number of cells was measured by using alamarBlue cell viability reagent (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Histological analysis and immunostaining
Tissues and tumor samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard protocol. For immunostaining, the antibodies used were anti-HA (C29F4) (Cell Signaling; dilution 1:100–500), anti-HA (Roche; dilution 1:50), anti-Ki67 (SP6) (Abcam; dilution 1:100–150), anti-BrdU (BU1/75 (ICR1)) (Abcam; dilution 1:100), anti-MBP (Abcam; dilution 1:100–200), anti-S100 (Dako; undiluted), anti-SOX10 (R&D; dilution 1:150), anti-GFP (4B10) (Cell signaling; dilution 1:150), anti-p53 (Ab240) (Abcam; dilution 1:250), and anti-p21 (HUGO291) (Abcam; dilution 1:100–500).
ALP staining and SA β-gal staining
Cultured cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and SA β-gal staining were performed with ALP Staining Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and Senescence β-Galactosidase Staining Kit (#9860S, Cell Signaling), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
siRNA transfection
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection was performed using Lipofectamine RNAi Max (Invitrogen) at 70–80% confluency. The siRNA targeting the breakpoint of EWS/ATF1 type 1 was used for the transfection9. Nontargeting siRNA was used as a control41.
Transduction of KRAB-fused TFs
KRAB-fused genes (Ebf1, SOX10, BRN2, NANOG) and control gene (GFP) were inserted into pMXs retroviral vector. In all, 12.75 µg of these vectors and 5.625 µg of pCMV-VSV-G were transfected into 1 × 107 competent cells using FuGENE HD (Roche) or PEI Max (PSI), and the viral supernatant was collected at 72 h after transfection. A total of 1 × 106 of sarcoma cells were infected using the same amount of viral supernatant for 10 to 12 h.
Array comparative genomic hybridization
Genomic DNA was extracted with PureLink® Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen). Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis was performed using SurePrint G3 Mouse Genome CGH Microarray Kit (Agilent) and analyzed using Agilent Genomic Workbench 7.0.
Microarray analysis
Two hundred nanograms of total RNA prepared with RNeasy Mini Kit was subjected to cDNA synthesis with WT Expression Kit (Ambion), and the resultant cDNA was fragmented and hybridized to HuGene-1.0-st-v1 (Affymetrix) and Mouse Gene 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix). After hybridization, GeneChip arrays were washed and stained by GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 (Affymetrix) and detected by Scanner 3000 TG system (Affymetrix) following the manufacturer’s standard protocols. The obtained data were analyzed using GeneSpring GX software (version 13.0, Agilent Technology).
ChIP-sequencing
Anti-HA antibody (Nacalai, mouse monoclonal, HA124) and anti-acetyl histone H3 (Lys27) (Wako, mouse monoclonal, MABI0309) were used for the ChIP-Seq analysis. Purified ChIP DNA was used for the generation of sequencing libraries with TruSeq ChIP Sample Prep Kit (Illumina). The resultant DNA libraries were assessed on Agilent Bioanalyzer and quantified with KAPA Library Quantification Kits (Kapa Biosystems). The libraries were sequenced to generate single-end 109 bp reads using Illumina HiSeq. We analyzed ChIP-Seq data by mapping the reads using Bowtie2. The sequencing reads were aligned to mouse genome build mm9 or mm10. We used the MACS43 version 1.4.2 or 2.1.1 peak finding algorithm to identify regions of ChIP-Seq enrichment over the background with P value = 1 × 10−9. Super enhancers were identified by H3K27ac with ROSE pipelines27,44. To analyze and visualize the mapped reads, ngsplot was used45. The motif analysis was performed using HOMER software46.
Exome analysis and direct sequencing
For the exome sequencing, 3 μg of the genome was extracted with PureLink Genomic DNA Kit. Whole-exome capture was performed with the SureSelect XT (Agilent Technologies). The exome libraries were then sequenced (109 bp paired-end reads) using a HiSeq2500 system (Illumina). The sequenced reads were mapped to the mouse reference genome (mm10) using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (bwa-0.7.12)47 after trimming the adaptor sequences and low-quality bases by cutadapt-1.8.148. Properly paired reads with a mapping quality of 30 or higher were extracted using samtools-1.249, duplicate reads were marked using picard-tools-1.134 (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/), and local realignment was performed using Genome Analysis Tool Kit (GATK-3.4-0) for further analyses. Mutation calling was performed using scripts in the Genomon-exome pipeline (http://genomon.hgc.jp/exome/en/index.html). We selected somatic variants by removing the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels that were reported in dbSNP Build 142 and by removing the overlapping variants that were present in the V6.5, 129, B6, or DBA2 exome data (DRX077372, DRX077363, DRX077364). A list of the common mutations in G1297 and sarcoma-iPSC#3 is shown in Supplementary Table 1. For direct sequencing analysis, the PCR product containing the mutation candidate site was sequenced with the genetic analyzer ABI 3500xL (Applied Biosystems).
Gene expression analysis in the mouse nervous system
Combinatorial gene expression patterns of neural crest-derived peripheral nervous system were analyzed by using the taxonomic transcriptome atlas of the mouse nervous system (http://www.mousebrain.org/).
PCR primers
Primers used in this study are shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Statistics
For comparison of the real-time quantitative RT-PCR data, Ki67-positive ratio, SA β-gal-positive ratio, and the cell growth assay, two-sided Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis. Mann–Whitney U test was used for single-cell RNA-Seq analysis. Mann–Whitney U test was used for xenograft analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Nishikawa and C. Alev for helpful discussions, and T. Nakamura and H. Moritake for providing CCS cell lines KAS and MP-CCS-SY, respectively. We are grateful to P. Karagiannis for critical reading of this manuscript, and A. Tanaka, M. Yagi, H. Aoki, S. Sakurai, D. Seki, K. Osugi, R. Sakamoto, M. Kikuchi, and M. Baba for technical assistance. The authors were supported in part by AMED-CREST under grant number JP18gm1110004; AMED P-CREATE (JP18cm0106203); JSPS KAKENHI (18H04026); Research Grants of Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund; the Takeda Science Foundation; the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research; and the Naito Foundation. Y.M. is employed by Chugai Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd. The ASHBi is supported by World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan.
Author contributions
S.K., K.I. and Y.Y. proposed the research project, designed the experiments, performed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. T.U., H.S., Y.M., K.H., N.J. and M.O. performed the experiments. T.Y., S.O., M.K., S.K., K.Semi and F.I. analyzed microarray, exome sequencing, ChIP-Seq, and single-cell sequencing data. M.S., K.W., K.Shimizu, J.T., T.O., H.A. and K.Sekiguchi provided materials and technical instructions.
Data availability
The ChIP-Seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession code GSE124873. The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession code GSE77203. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary information file.
Competing interests
Y.M. is employed by Chugai Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors equally contributed: Shingo Komura, Kenji Ito.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-11745-1.
References
- 1.Kinzler KW, et al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science. 1991;253:661–665. doi: 10.1126/science.1651562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Groden J, et al. Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell. 1991;66:589–600. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miki Y, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266:66–71. doi: 10.1126/science.7545954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barker N, et al. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature. 2009;457:608–611. doi: 10.1038/nature07602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haldar M, Hancock JD, Coffin CM, Lessnick SL, Capecchi MR. A conditional mouse model of synovial sarcoma: insights into a myogenic origin. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:375–388. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hisaoka M, et al. Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 33 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008;32:452–460. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31814b18fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chung EB, Enzinger FM. Malignant melanoma of soft parts. A reassessment of clear cell sarcoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1983;7:405–413. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198307000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davis IJ, et al. Oncogenic MITF dysregulation in clear cell sarcoma: defining the MiT family of human cancers. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:473–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yamada K, et al. EWS/ATF1 expression induces sarcomas from neural crest-derived cells in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:600–610. doi: 10.1172/JCI63572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Straessler KM, et al. Modeling clear cell sarcomagenesis in the mouse: cell of origin differentiation state impacts tumor characteristics. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ohnishi K, et al. Premature termination of reprogramming in vivo leads to cancer development through altered epigenetic regulation. Cell. 2014;156:663–677. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hashimoto K, et al. Cellular context-dependent consequences of Apc mutations on gene regulation and cellular behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:758–763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614197114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hochedlinger K, et al. Reprogramming of a melanoma genome by nuclear transplantation. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1875–1885. doi: 10.1101/gad.1213504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kang TW, et al. Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development. Nature. 2011;479:547–551. doi: 10.1038/nature10599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, Beach D, Lowe SW. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell. 1997;88:593–602. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81902-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Collado M, Serrano M. The power and the promise of oncogene-induced senescence markers. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:472–476. doi: 10.1038/nrc1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stockman DL, et al. Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular analysis of 16 cases with a reappraisal of clear cell sarcoma-like tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012;36:857–868. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31824644ac. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Segal NH, et al. Classification of clear-cell sarcoma as a subtype of melanoma by genomic profiling. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:1775–1781. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sørensen SA, Mulvihill JJ, Nielsen A. Long-term follow-up of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Survival and malignant neoplasms. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986;314:1010–1015. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198604173141603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.D’Antonio M, et al. Resetting translational homeostasis restores myelination in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1B mice. J. Exp. Med. 2013;210:821–838. doi: 10.1084/jem.20122005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jux B, et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates UVB radiation-induced skin tanning. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2011;131:203–210. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Staverosky JA, Pryce BA, Watson SS, Schweitzer R. Tubulin polymerization-promoting protein family member 3, Tppp3, is a specific marker of the differentiating tendon sheath and synovial joints. Dev. Dyn. 2009;238:685–692. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat. Genet. 1999;21:70–71. doi: 10.1038/5007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zeisel A, et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell. 2018;174:999–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Feser J, et al. Elevated histone expression promotes life span extension. Mol. Cell. 2010;39:724–735. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ivanov A, et al. Lysosome-mediated processing of chromatin in senescence. J. Cell Biol. 2013;202:129–143. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201212110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Whyte WA, et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell. 2013;153:307–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yue F, et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature. 2014;515:355–364. doi: 10.1038/nature13992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wapinski OL, et al. Hierarchical mechanisms for direct reprogramming of fibroblasts to neurons. Cell. 2013;155:621–635. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Simões-Costa M, Tan-Cabugao J, Antoshechkin I, Sauka-Spengler T, Bronner ME. Transcriptome analysis reveals novel players in the cranial neural crest gene regulatory network. Genome Res. 2014;24:281–290. doi: 10.1101/gr.161182.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang W, et al. Nur77 was essential for neurite outgrowth and involved in Schwann cell differentiation after sciatic nerve injury. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2015;57:38–47. doi: 10.1007/s12031-015-0575-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Benhaddou A, et al. Transcription factor TEAD4 regulates expression of myogenin and the unfolded protein response genes during C2C12 cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:220–231. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huntley S, et al. A comprehensive catalog of human KRAB-associated zinc finger genes: insights into the evolutionary history of a large family of transcriptional repressors. Genome Res. 2006;16:669–677. doi: 10.1101/gr.4842106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jaegle M, et al. The POU proteins Brn-2 and Oct-6 share important functions in Schwann cell development. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1380–1391. doi: 10.1101/gad.258203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Britsch S, et al. The transcription factor Sox10 is a key regulator of peripheral glial development. Genes Dev. 2001;15:66–78. doi: 10.1101/gad.186601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Patzig J, et al. Quantitative and integrative proteome analysis of peripheral nerve myelin identifies novel myelin proteins and candidate neuropathy loci. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:16369–16386. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4016-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hohenstein P, et al. High-efficiency Rosa26 knock-in vector construction for Cre-regulated overexpression and RNAi. Pathogenetics. 2008;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1755-8417-1-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Beard C, Hochedlinger K, Plath K, Wutz A, Jaenisch R. Efficient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-specific integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis. 2006;44:23–28. doi: 10.1002/gene.20180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moritake H, et al. Newly established clear cell sarcoma (malignant melanoma of soft parts) cell line expressing melanoma-associated Melan-A antigen and overexpressing C-MYC oncogene. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2002;135:48–56. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4608(01)00641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Komura S, et al. An EWS-FLI1-Induced osteosarcoma model unveiled a crucial role of impaired osteogenic differentiation on osteosarcoma development. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;6:592–606. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Takigami I, et al. Synthetic siRNA targeting the breakpoint of EWS/Fli-1 inhibits growth of Ewing sarcoma xenografts in a mouse model. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;128:216–226. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Takahashi K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang Y, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Loven J, et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell. 2013;153:320–334. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shen L, Shao N, Liu X, Nestler E. ngs.plot: Quick mining and visualization of next-generation sequencing data by integrating genomic databases. BMC Genom. 2014;15:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Heinz S, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell. 2010;38:576–589. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li H, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Castellsagué J, et al. Comprehensive establishment and characterization of orthoxenograft mouse models of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors for personalized medicine. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015;7:608–627. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Su Y, et al. RAF265 inhibits the growth of advanced human melanoma tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:2184–2198. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The ChIP-Seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession code GSE124873. The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession code GSE77203. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary information file.