Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 19;9(4):522–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.07.004

Table 2.

Characteristics of Included Studies.

Author Study Experimental group Control group HCV gen Patients Age
Men
Race, N (%) Cirrhosi
IL28B genotype, N (%)
Name Phase Drug Dose (mg) Treatment duration (weeks) N patients Drugc N patients Median (range) No (%) White Black Others No (%) CC CT TT
Pearlman 2015 2 SIM + SOF 150 + 400 12 58 SOF + PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV 24 1a Naive and previously treated 56.5b 53 (64.6) 38 (46) 39 (47) 5 (6) 82 (100) No CC: 71 (86.6)
Reddy 2015 ATTAIN 3 SIM + placebo + Peg-IFNα2a/RBV 150 + 750 12 379 Tel + placebo + PEG-IFNα2a/RBV 384 1a
1b
Previously treated 51 (18–69) 466 (61.1) 719 (94.2) 38 (5) 6 (0.8) 163 (21.4) 33 (4.3) 472 (61.8) 223 (29.2)
Zeuzem 2014 ASPIRE 2b SIM + PEG-IFN/RBV 100 12 66 Placebo + PEG-IFN/RBV 61b6 1a
1b
Previously treated 50 (20–69) 311 (67.3) 428 (92) 34 (7) Na 83 (18.2) 58 (17.7) 212 (64.6) 58 (17.7)
100 24 65
100 48 66
150 12 66
150 24 68
150 48 65
Hayashi 2014 DRAGON Nr SIM + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 50 12 27 PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 13 1b Naive 54 (20–69) 43 (47) Na Na 92 (100) 0 (0) nr nr nr
50 24 13
100 12 26
100 24 13
Forns 2014 PROMISE 3 SIM + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 150 12 260 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 133 1a
1b
Previously treated 52 (20–71) 258 (65.6) 371 (94.4) 11 (2.8) Na 0 (0) 96 (24.4) 250 (63.6) 47 (12)
Hayashi 2014 CONCERTO-I 3 SIM + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 100 12 123 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 60 1a
1b
Naive 55 (23–69) 63 (34.4) Nr Nr Nr 0(0) 121 (66) 62 (34) Na
Jacobson 2014 QUEST-I 3 SIM + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 100 12 264 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 130 1a
1b
Naive 48 (36–54) 222 (56.3) 349 (88.6) 31 (7.8) 8 (2) Na 114 (28.9) 226 (57.3) 54 (13.7)
Manns 2014 QUEST-II 3 SIM + PEG-IFNα-2a or 2b/RBV 150 12 257 Placebo + PEG-IFNα/RBV 134 1a
1b
Naive 45 (18–73) 217 (55.5) 360 (92) 26 (6.6) 5 (1.2) 32 (8) 117 (30) 213 (54.5) 61 (15.6)
Fried 2013 PILLAR 2b SIM + PEG-IFNα-2a 75 12 78 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a 77 1a
1b
Naive 47 (18–69) 213 (55.2) 362 (93.8) 13 (3.4) 11 (2.8) Na 78 (20.2) 152 (39.4) 32 (8.3)
75 24 75
150 12 77
150 24 79
Jacobson 2013 POSITRONa 3 SOF + RBV 400 12 207 Placebo + RBV 71 2; 3 Previously treated 52b (21–75) 151 (54.3) 254 (91.4) 13 (4.6) 11 (6.2) 44 (15.8) 126 (45.3) 120 (43) 32 (11.5)
Lawitz 2013 2 SOF + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 200 12 48 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 26 1a
1b
Naive 48.4 73 (60.3) 97 (80) 18 (14.9) 6 (5) Na 50 (41.3) 54 (44.6) 17 (14)
400
Dore 2015 2b DACL + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 60 12 50 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 51 2; 3 Naive 48.6 (20–67) 96 (63.6) 129 (85.4) 4 (2.6) 18 (11.9) 19 (12.6) 56 (37) 76 (50.3) 17 (11.3)
16 51
Hezodè 2015 COMMAND-1 2b DACL + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 20 12 159 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 78 1a
1b
4
Naive 50.5 (18–70) 265 (67) 319 (80.7) 45 (11.4) 31 (7.8) 29 (7.3) 120 (30.4) 206 (52) 46 (11.6)
60 12 158
Kumada 2016 3b DACL + ASU 60 + 100 24 119 Tel + placebo + PEG-IFNα2a/RBV 111 1b Naive 56 (20–70) 102 (44) Nr Nr Nr Na 153 (66.5) 70 (30.4) 5 (2.2)
Izumi 2014 2a DACL + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 10 24 9 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 8 1a
1b
Naïve 56 (28–67) 9 (36) Nr Nr Nr 0 (0) 19 (76) 5 (20) 0(0)
60 24 8
Pol 2012 2a DACL + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 3 12 12 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 12 1a
1b
Naive 51 (28–68) 32 (66.6) 35 (72.9) 9 (18.7) 4 (8.3) Na 13 (27) 18 (37.5) 5 (10.4)
10 12
60 12
Bronowicki 2014 2b ASU + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 200 24 177 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 61 1a
1b
4
Naive 47.8 153 (64.3) 199 (83.6) 20 (8.4) 19(8) 25 (10.5) 66 (27.7) 128 (53.7) 36 (15.1)
Bronowicki 2013 2a ASU + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 200 48 12 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 11 1a
1b
Naive 48 35 (74.4) 38 (80.8) 8 (17) 1 (2) Na 13 (27.6) 24 (51) 10 (21)
600 twice d
600 once d
Rodriguez-Torres 2014 2b FIL + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 300 24 96 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 96 1 Naive 47.8 (10) 153 (53) 227 (78.8). 18 (6.2) 43 (14.9)- Na 63 (21.8) 106 (368) 27 (9.3)
600
Manns 2014 2 GRAZ (MK-5172) + PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV 100 12 66 Placebo + BOC + PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV 66 1b Naive 51b (18–72) 191 (57.5) 272 (81.9) 44 (13.2) 16 (4.8) Na Nr Nr Nr
200 68
400 67
800 65
Sulkowski 2013 SILENC-1 2b FAL + PEG-IFNα -2a/RBV 120 24 69 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 71 1a
1b
Naive 46b (SD 10.5) 234 (54) 356 (82.9) 10 (2.3) 63 (14.6) Na 60 (14) no CC 163 (38)
240 143
240 146
Ferenci 2015 STARTVerson 1 3 FAL + PEG-IFNα -2a/RBV 120 12 259 Placebo + PEG-IFNa2a/RBV 132 1a
1b
Naive 47,6b 342 (52.4) 511 (78.4) 9 (1.4) 132 (20.2) 30 (6) 254 (38.9) 316 (48.4) 81 (12.4)
240 261
Marcellin 2013 ATLAS 2 DAN +PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 300 12 72 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 31 1a
1b
Naive 48.3 135 (60) 193 (85.7) 22 (9.7) 10 (4.4) Na 56 (24.8) Nr Nr
600 72
900 50
Everson 2015 DAUPHINE 2 DAN/r + PEG-IFNα-a/RBV 200/100 24 92 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 44 1a
1b
4
Naive 52.5 (19–73) 202 (62.5) 259 (80) 34 (10.5) 30 (9.3) Na 94 (29.1) No CC 229 (70.9)
100/100 93
50/100 94
Hayashi 2015 3 VAN + PEG-IFNα-a/RBV 300 12 98 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV 98 1a
1b
Naive Nr 137 (46.6) Nr Nr Nr Na 198 (67.3) 92 (31.3) 4 (1.4)
24 98
Lawitz 2013 2b VAN + PEG-IFNα-a/RBV 300 48 41 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 42 1a
1b
Previously treated 51 (23–65) 82 (67.2) 95 (77.8) 7 (5.7) 23 (18.9) 0 (0) Nr Nr Nr
600 42
Rodriguez-torres 2014 2b VAN + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 300 24 13 Placebo + PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV 14 1a
1b
Previously treated 55.5 (38–65) 49 (66.2) 65 (87.8) 4 (5.4) 5(6.7) 74 (100) nr nr nr
300 48 13
600 24 15
600 48 15
Dore 2016 MALACHITE I/II 3b OBV/PTV/r + DAS + RBV 25 12 or 16 337 Tel + placebo + PEG-IFNα2a/RBV 122 1a
1b
Naive and previously treated 46b 243 (52.9) 440 (95.9) (0) 59 (12.8) Nr 79 (17.9) no CC 380 (82.8)
100
150
250

ASU, asunaprevir; BOC, boceprevir; DACL, daclatasvir; DAN, danoprevir; DAS, dasabuvir; FAL, faldaprevir; FIL, filibuvir; GRAZ, grazoprevir; IFN, interferone; n, number; nr, not reported; na, not available; OBV/PTV/r, ombitasvir/paritaprevir, ritonavir; RBV, ribavirin; SIM, simeprevir; SOF, sofosbuvir; Tel, telaprevir; VAN, vanoprevir.

a

Authors reported also the FUSION study results, administering sofosbuvir in all study arms.

b

Results reported as mean.

c

Dosage of PEG-IFNα/RBV was 180 μg/1000–1200 mg in all studies included.