Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;15:1176934319871290. doi: 10.1177/1176934319871290

Table 4.

Prediction performance on different data sets (AUROC).

Enzyme type Data set
Data set 1
(P* > .6)
98 095 sites
Data set 2
(P > .7)
75 720 sites
Data set 3
(P > .8)
52 687 sites
Data set 4
(P > .9)
27 646 sites
Erasers (FTO vs ALKBH5) 0.873 0.873 0.872 0.888
Writers (M3/M14 vs M16) 0.889 0.888 0.911 0.877

Abbreviations: ALKBH5, ALKB homolog 5; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristics; FTO, fat mass and obesity–associated protein.

Four data sets were considered, corresponding to the experiment-validated RNA methylation sites from RMBase and also supported by WHISTLE prediction with probability greater than .6, .7, .8, and .9, respectively. The detailed performance of 5 different classification predictors (RF, SVM, GLM, Naïve Bayes, and decision tree) is presented in Supplementary Table S2.