Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;95(3):311–318. doi: 10.1177/0022034515621495

Table.

Micro–computed Tomography Analysis of Alveolar Bone.

28 d 56 d
Parameter 0 d Static HFA Static HFA
BV/TV, % 27.4 ± 3 33 ± 4.6 46 ± 5.9a,b 18 ± 4.8a 62 ± 7.2a,b
Tb.Th, mm 0.14 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02 0.23 ± 0.01a,b 0.19 ± 0.02a 0.31 ± 0.01a,b,c
Tb.N, 1/mm 2.03 ± 0.24 2.06 ± 0.21 2 ± 0.20 2 ± 0.22 2.01 ± 0.21
Tb.Sp, mm 0.36 ± 0.05 0.33 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.04a 0.30 ± 0.01a 0.19 ±0.02a,b,c
TMD, mg/mL 396 ± 49 774 ± 46a 918 ± 68a,b 756 ± 54a 973 ± 52a,b

BV/TV, ratio of bone volume/total volume based on area defined in Figure 1A; HFA, high-frequency acceleration; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp, trabecular spacing; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; TMD, tissue mineral density.

Micro–computed tomography quantification was completed for static and HFA hemimaxillae at baseline (day 0) and 28 and 56 d after extraction. Tb.Th, Tb.N, Tb.Sp, and TMD were measured in the bone of the apical third of the socket of the distal root. Each value represents the mean ± SEM of 5 animals.

a

Significantly different from day 0.

b

Significantly different from static group at same time point

c

Significantly different from same group at previous time point.