Table 1.
Group Comparison of Good and Poor Rehabilitation Effects.
| GRE group n = 21 |
PRE group n = 22 |
t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 58.9 ± 14.11 | 61.1 ± 11.2 | 0.258 | 0.085 |
| Women | 10 (48) | 10 (45) | 0.572 | |
| Arterial hypertension | 14 (67) | 16 (73) | 0.208 | |
| Hyperlipidemia | 4 (19) | 3 (14) | 0.933 | |
| Diabetes | 6 (29) | 9 (41) | 0.265 | |
| Coronary heart disease | 5 (24) | 4 (18) | 0.367 | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 1 (5) | 1 (5) | 1 | |
| C-reactive protein increase | 7 (33) | 8 (36) | 0.661 | |
| History of myocardial infarction | 1 (5) | 0 | 1 | |
| Family history of stroke | 4 (19) | 5 (23) | 0.427 | |
| Admission NIHSS score | 11.5 ± 2.1 | 11.4 ± 3.1 | 0.103 | 0.731 |
| Infarct volume, mm3 | 22.6 ± 3.9 | 26.8 ± 4.1 | 0.669 | 0.122 |
Age, admission NIHSS score and infarct volume are expressed as mean ± SD. All other data are expressed as number (percentage).
GRE: good rehabilitation effect; PRE: poor rehabilitation effect; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.