Table 3.
Multiple regression analysis
BESAQ |
EF |
OF |
SD |
IS |
OS |
IIEF – total score |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t | P value | t | P value | t | P value | t | P value | t | P value | t | P value | t | P value | |
Age | −2.96 | .01 | ||||||||||||
NYHA class | −2.64 | .0001 | −2.11 | .03 | −4.11 | .001 | ||||||||
VAS score | ||||||||||||||
Presence of OSA | 2.65 | .01 | ||||||||||||
BMI | ||||||||||||||
How do you rate your weigh—normal | 2.22 | .03 | ||||||||||||
BESAQ | ||||||||||||||
Education—secondary | 2.60 | .01 | ||||||||||||
Employment—unemployed | −4.11 | .001 | ||||||||||||
Employment—blue collar worker | 4.39 | .001 | ||||||||||||
Duration of relationship (years) | −2.71 | .01 | ||||||||||||
Quality of relationship∗—poor | −2.13 | .03 | −2.21 | .03 | −2.63 | .01 | −2.2 | .03 | ||||||
Quality of relationship∗—good | 2.65 | .01 | 2.98 | .001 | 2.57 | .01 | ||||||||
Importance of sex∗—low | −3.34 | .01 | −2.73 | .01 | ||||||||||
Importance of sex∗—medium | −2.01 | .04 | ||||||||||||
Importance of sex∗—high | 2.11 | .04 |
Only significant variables are presented and bolded.
Statistics for the models: for EF, adjusted R2 for the model = .31, F(5,89) = 5.89, P = .0001; for IS, adjusted R2 = .34, F(8,84) = 5.53, P = .00001; for OF, adjusted R2 = .45, F(10,78) = 6.51, P = .0001; for SD, adjusted R2 = .31, F(4,44) = 4.78, P = .003; for OS, adjusted R2 = .24; F(4,82) = 6.58, P = .0001; for total IIEF score, adjusted R2 = .30, F(1,34) = 6.25, P = .001; for BESAQ, adjusted R2 = .14; F(3,81) = 4.46, P = .01.
BESAQ = Body Exposure in Sexual Activities Questionnaire; CSFQ = Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire; EF = erectile function; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IIEF-15 = International Index of Erectile Function; IS = intercourse satisfaction; NYHA = New York Heart Association; OF = orgasmic function; OS = overall satisfaction; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; SD = sexual desire; VAS = Visual Analogue Scale.
5-point Likert scale.