Table 1.
Full sample (N=142,407) |
NH white (N=70,920) |
NH black (N=23,287) |
Hispanic (N=39,366) |
Asian (N=8834) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child has asthma diagnosis | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.13 | *** | 0.07 | *** | 0.04 | ||||||
Total number of visits, 2011–2012 | 2.98 | (2.13) | 3.13 | (2.23) | 2.74 | (1.87) | *** | 2.95 | (2.16) | *** | 2.64 | (1.70) | *** |
Child is male | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.52 | ||||||||
Child’s age (years) | 5.71 | (3.22) | 5.78 | (3.27) | 5.81 | (3.20) | 5.66 | (3.13) | *** | 5.17 | (3.10) | *** | |
Insurance Status | |||||||||||||
Private | 0.72 | 0.90 | 0.48 | *** | 0.48 | *** | 0.91 | ||||||
Public | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.52 | *** | 0.52 | *** | 0.09 | ||||||
Neighborhood Characteristics | |||||||||||||
Environmental | |||||||||||||
Average ozone concentration, 2010–2012 | 25.91 | (1.05) | 26.22 | (1.09) | 25.58 | (0.85) | *** | 25.60 | (0.98) | *** | 25.70 | (0.72) | *** |
Average PM2.5 concentration, 2010–2012 | 10.38 | (0.42) | 10.31 | (0.35) | 10.46 | (0.44) | *** | 10.50 | (0.48) | *** | 10.20 | (0.30) | *** |
PM2.5 quartile 1 (low) | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.15 | *** | 0.14 | *** | 0.33 | *** | |||||
PM2.5 quartile 2 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.30 | *** | 0.27 | *** | 0.33 | *** | |||||
PM2.5 quartile 3 | 0.32 | 0.40 | 0.22 | *** | 0.25 | *** | 0.29 | *** | |||||
PM2.5 quartile 4 (high) | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.33 | *** | 0.34 | *** | 0.05 | *** | |||||
Socioeconomic | |||||||||||||
Concentrated disadvantage (std) | 0.00 | (1.00) | −0.41 | (0.67) | 0.71 | (1.25) | *** | 0.43 | (0.98) | *** | −0.46 | (0.66) | *** |
Race/Ethnic Composition | |||||||||||||
Percent co-ethnic | 0.50 | (0.26) | 0.62 | (0.20) | 0.35 | (0.25) | *** | 0.45 | (0.25) | *** | 0.15 | (0.11) | *** |
p < 0.01
p < 0.05
p < 0.001
sig. differences between NH white children and indicated race/ethnic group.
Note: Co-ethnic represents the percent of neighborhood residents who share the respondent’s race/ethnicity.