Table 3. A comparison of the proposed model with the previous methods to identify hydroxylation of proline using jackknife test in the validation of benchmark datasets extracted from (a) dbptm and (b) uniprot.

Predictors	Sn (%)	Sp (%)	Acc (%)	MCC
iHyd-PseAAC	80.66	80.54	80.57	0.51
iHyd-PseCp	86.35	99.12	96.58	0.89
iHyd-PseAAC (EPSV)a	98.68	94.82	96.80	0.90
iHyd-PseAAC (EPSV)b	97.02	94.57	96.01	0.88