Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;19:883. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6093-3

Table 1.

Comparison between the excluded and the study samples characteristics (total N = 705)

Excluded sample (n = 113) Study sample (n = 592) Test comparing study sample with excluded sample characteristics
N % or mean (sd) N % or mean (sd)
Treatment (total N = 696) Intensive chemotherapy 7 7 187 32 p* < 0.001
Best supporting care 81 12 179 30
Hypomethylating agents 12 3 175 7
Aracytine low dose 3 78 42 30
Others 1 1 9 1
Patient’s characteristics
 Age Median (inter-quartile range) 80 10 74 12 p # < 0.001
 Sex Men 59 52 364 61 p § = 0.065
Women 54 48 228 39

 Patients’ SEP (EDI quintile)

(total N = 613)

Q1 – least deprived 3 14 124 21
Q2 6 29 104 18
Q3 6 29 127 21 p * = 0.388
Q4 5 24 137 23
Q5 – most deprived 1 5 100 17
 Charlson comorbidity index 0 20 19 261 44
1 11 10 122 21 p § = 0.001
2+ 12 11 104 18
Undefinable 64 60 105 18
 Performance status 0/1 26 25 309 52
2 13 13 91 15 p § = 0.001
3/4 10 10 60 10
Undefinable 55 53 132 22
Tumor’s characteristics
 White blood cell counts (tercile) (total N = 599) Tercile 1 – low 1 14 195 33
Tercile 2 – intermediate 4 57 189 32 p * = 0.393
Tercile 3 – high 2 29 193 33
Undefinable 0 0 15 3
 AML ontogeny (total N = 704) AML de novo 36 32 301 51
Secondary AML (post treatment / MDS) 41 37 268 45 p § < 0.001
Undefinable 35 31 23 4
 Cytogenetic initial prognosis Favorable/Intermediate 50 44 343 58 p § < 0.001
Unfavorable 26 23 203 34
Undefinable 37 33 46 8

p-value for Fisher test *, chi-square test §, or Wilcoxon #