Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 28;24(4):886–894. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3676-03.2004

Table 1.

Coupling efficiency and junctional conductance of innexin-expressing Xenopus oocyte pairs


Oocyte injection (cell 1/cell 2)

Mass injected (ng/cell)

Proportion of cells displaying coupling (%)

n

Maximum steady-state conductance of gap junction (μS)
Hm-inx1/Hm-inx1 10 25 36 4.06 ± 1.18 (9)
Hm-inx2/Hm-inx2 10 48 27 1.70 ± 0.49 (13)
Hm-inx1/Hm-inx2 10 44 18 1.54 ± 0.53 (8)
Dm-shakB(lethal)/Dm-shakB(lethal) 2 77 13 13.19 ± 2.99 (10)
H2O/H2O
N/A
0
30
0.11 ± 0.04 (30)

Oocytes were microinjected with an antisense Cx38 oligonucleotide and either innexin mRNA or water. The vitelline membrane was then removed, and oocytes were paired (see Materials and Methods). Recordings were made 2-6d after pairing using the dual voltage-clamp technique. Junctional conductance is shown as the maximum steady-state conductance observed, expressed as a mean ± SEM (number in parentheses indicates the number of cell pairs analyzed). Maximum conductance was observed on injection of a low depolarizing voltage step (homotypic Hm-inx1 and Dm-shakB(lethal)), a low hyperpolarizing voltage step (homotypic Hm-inx2), or a large hyperpolarizing step injected into the Hm-inx2-expressing cell (heterotypic junctions), as shown in the Gj/Vj plots (Figs. 5B, 6B, 7C).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure