Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2019 Jul 8;38(22):4334–4347. doi: 10.1002/sim.8300

Table 1.

Simulation estimated bias, relative bias, and standard error of bias (based on 500 replicates mimicking the dental data, n=200) for mediation (natural direct (D) and indirect (I)) effects on ratio scale; subscripts (20 and 40) indicate times for indirect effects; m indicates the number of (equally spaced) measurements for simulated data. Note: all 500 replicates were used for m = 6 and 11; one resulted in non-convergence (499 were used) for m = 3

Bias Rel Bias SE Bias
Estimand True m = 3 6 11 m = 3 6 11 m = 3 6 11
Dr 1.350 0.068 0.036 0.022 0.051 0.026 0.017 0.021 0.015 0.012
I20r 1.653 −0.033 0.003 −0.018 −0.018 0.003 −0.009 0.013 0.012 0.011
I40r 1.279 0.060 0.053 0.038 0.048 0.042 0.031 0.009 0.008 0.007
ABCr 13.403 −0.480 −0.821 −0.578 −0.030 −0.057 −0.037 0.237 0.189 0.175
I20r(prop) 0.625 0.107 0.028 0.027 0.174 0.047 0.045 0.056 0.034 0.010
I40r(prop) 0.449 0.220 0.140 0.065 0.445 0.315 0.157 0.321 0.051 0.026
ABCr (prop) 0.598 −0.368 0.060 0.032 −0.650 0.102 0.055 0.483 0.021 0.011