Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2019 Jul 8;38(22):4334–4347. doi: 10.1002/sim.8300

Table 4.

Results for analysis of dental data – inference for mediation (natural direct (D) and indirect (I)) estimands on mean ratio scale. Estimates and, for indirect effects, proportions are given along with bootstrap percentile method 95% confidence intervals (499 bootstrap samples generated, 489 used). Subscripts indicate time (age in months) for (cross-sectional) indirect effects. ABC (area between the curves) provides overall indirect effect for specified intervention (starting at indicated time)

Estimand Est 95% CI Prop. 95% CI
Dr 2.05 (1.02, 4.19) - -
I8r 0.98 (0.53, 1.61) −0.03 (−4.35, 1.87)
I18r 0.91 (0.72, 1.76) −0.14 (−0.88, 0.85)
I36r 1.31 (1.04, 2.11) 0.27 (0.03, 0.93)
ABCr(A1,0) 0.64 (−6.27, 16.39) 0.03 (−0.38, 0.89)
ABCr(A1,8) 0.01 (−4.40, 11.83) 0.0007 (−0.26, 0.56)
ABCr(A1,18) −0.03 (−0.63, 1.58) −0.002 (−0.03, 0.08)