Table 1.
Target | Sequence | Closest gene | Feature | % Reads with Indels | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mock | WT1 | WT2 | HF1 | HF2 | ||||
CCR5 | GCAGCATAGTGAGCCCAGAAGGG | CCR5 | Exon | 0.128 | 93.41 | 95.832 | 92.377 | 93.078 |
CCR5_OT3 | ACAGAATAGAGAGCCCAGAAAGG | GRID1 | Intergenic | 0 | 0.467 | 0.434 | 0.03 | 0.045 |
CCR5_OT14 | ACAGCATAGAGGGCCCAGAAGGG | SUOX | Exon | 0 | 0.105 | 0.128 | 0.095 | 0.051 |
CCR5_OT39 | ACAGCATAGTGAACCCAGGAGGG | TBPL2 | Intergenic | 0.017 | 0.388 | 0.302 | 0.102 | 0.052 |
CCR5_OT40 | GCTGCATAGTGAACCCAGTATGG | ZNF609 | Intergenic | 0.032 | 0.122 | 0.245 | 0.031 | 0.014 |
PAM sequences are shown as bold and mismatched bases are shown as italics. For all of these sites the percent of Indels was <0.5% using wild type (WT) Cas9. For 4 of these sites, the use of the HiFi Cas9 abolished off-target activity