Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;10:4045. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11962-8

Table 1.

Summary of off-target sites (OT’s) above level of detection (>0.1%)

Target Sequence Closest gene Feature % Reads with Indels
Mock WT1 WT2 HF1 HF2
CCR5 GCAGCATAGTGAGCCCAGAAGGG CCR5 Exon 0.128 93.41 95.832 92.377 93.078
CCR5_OT3 ACAGAATAGAGAGCCCAGAAAGG GRID1 Intergenic 0 0.467 0.434 0.03 0.045
CCR5_OT14 ACAGCATAGAGGGCCCAGAAGGG SUOX Exon 0 0.105 0.128 0.095 0.051
CCR5_OT39 ACAGCATAGTGAACCCAGGAGGG TBPL2 Intergenic 0.017 0.388 0.302 0.102 0.052
CCR5_OT40 GCTGCATAGTGAACCCAGTATGG ZNF609 Intergenic 0.032 0.122 0.245 0.031 0.014

PAM sequences are shown as bold and mismatched bases are shown as italics. For all of these sites the percent of Indels was   <0.5% using wild type (WT) Cas9. For 4 of these sites, the use of the HiFi Cas9 abolished off-target activity