Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 16;116(36):17890–17899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902731116

Table 3.

Bivariate selection gradient analysis

Term Halle fall Norwich fall Norwich spring Norwich summer Valencia fall
Est. SE Est. SE Est. SE Est. SE Est. SE
βBPTU −0.13* 0.10 0.33 0.17 −0.01 0.08 0.20* 0.07 −0.02 0.09
βbranch 0.72* 0.05 1.15* 0.11 0.77* 0.09 0.53* 0.04 0.71* 0.08
γBPTU −9.10 120 5.84 146 −30.2 90.8 −60.1 100 82.2 114
γbranch 0.06 0.31 0.90 1.11 −0.00 0.18 0.06 0.16 0.18 0.22
γBPTU,branch −0.11 0.14 0.28 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.10 0.06 −0.07 0.19

β, analogous to the directional selection coefficient; BPTU, accumulated photothermal units to bolting; branch, total number of branches; Est., estimate of the coefficient; γ, analogous to the stabilizing or disruptive coefficient; SE, numerically approximated SE.

*

Bolded estimates with asterisks represent significance from Bonferroni-corrected P values <0.05.