Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e031054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031054

Table 5.

Piecewise logistic regression analysis of the comprehensive prevention programme effects* on violence

Full model† Simple model‡
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Trend prior to intervention (per month) 1.09 (0.81 to 1.49) 0.5848
Immediate change in level
 A 0.31 (0.03 to 3.20) 0.3236
 BC added to A 2.19 (0.70 to 6.82) 0.1773
 D added to ABC 1.05 (0.28 to 3.88) 0.9406
 E added to ABCD 5.73 (2.08 to 15.77) 0.0007
Change in trend (per month)
 A 0.95 (0.55 to 1.65) 0.8657 0.87 (0.82 to 0.92) <0.0001
 BC added to A 0.61 (0.33 to 1.13) 0.1188
 D added to ABC 1.85 (0.98 to 3.48) 0.0572 1.45 (1.14 to 1.84) 0.0022
 E added to ABCD 0.35 (0.17 to 0.70) 0.0031 0.65 (0.45 to 0.93) 0.0194

Components: A corresponds to computerised triage algorithm, BC corresponds to signage and messages broadcast on TV in the waiting rooms, D corresponds to mediator and E corresponds to video surveillance.

*Logistic generalised estimating equation model adjusted for waiting time>2 hours. OR<1 represent a decline and inversely, OR>1 represent an increase in monthly likelihood of violence occurrence during admission at OED per month.

†Full model included time effect and immediate changes after each component’s implementation and changes in slopes.

‡Parsimonious model after backward selection.

OED, ophthalmology emergency department.