Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2019 Jul 8;114(10):1854–1865. doi: 10.1111/add.14646

Table 4.

Correlations between the latent 20-item MACQ factor and composite scores of marijuana use variables across sex and countries

Negative Consequences Correlation Differences Across Sex and Countries

U.S. AR UY ES Men Women Men - Women U.S. -AR U.S. -UY U.S. -ES AR -UY AR -ES UY -ES
Marijuana Use Indicators

Use Frequency Last 30 Days .41 .41 .64 .59 .51 .37 .14 .00 .23 .18 .23 .18 .05
Age of First Use* −.12 −.24 −.17 --- −.18 −.13 .05 .12 .05 --- .07 --- ---
Typical Quant. .26 .31 .42 .30 .28 .26 .02 .05 .16 .04 .11 .01 .12
Typical Freq. .36 .45 .61 .61 .44 .35 .09 .09 .25 .25 .16 .16 .00
Typical Subjective Intox. .13 .38 .51 .41 .15 .22 .07 .25 .38 .28 .13 .03 .10
Length of Typical Intox. (hours) .01 .26 .26 .49 .14 .17 .03 .25 .25 .48 .00 .23 .23

Marijuana Use Norms

Descript. Norms Typ. Quant. .09 .24 .43 .20 .04 .19 .15 .15 .34 .11 .19 .04 .23
Descript. Norms Typ. Freq. .19 .32 .49 .39 .21 .23 .02 .13 .30 .20 .17 .07 .10
Inj. Norms Typ. Quant. .12 .22 .33 .13 .06 .17 .11 .10 .21 .01 .11 .09 .20
Inj. Norms Typ. Freq. .19 .28 .35 .14 .20 .17 .03 .09 .16 .05 .07 .14 .21

Injunctive Norms of Others

Inj. Norms – Best Friend .06 .26 .28 .20 .10 .09 .01 .20 .22 .14 .02 .06 .08
Inj. Norms – College Student −.11 .03 −.16 −.03 −.06 −.09 .03 .14 .05 .08 .19 .06 .13
Inj. Norms – Parents −.04 .09 .09 .09 −.08 .00 .08 .13 .13 .13 .00 .00 .00

Note. U.S. =United States (n = 697); AR=Argentina (n = 153), UY = Uruguay (n = 55), ES=Spain (n = 174), M = Men (n = 403), W = Women (n = 699). All correlations were conducted with the 20-item version (item 5 omitted) of the MACQ. In comparison across countries, medium correlation differences are italicized (.14 < rdiff < .24), large differences are bolded (.24 ≤ rdiff < .34), and substantial difference are bolded and underlined (rdiff ≥ .34).