Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul 4;67(9):1917–1921. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16035

Table 1:

Participant characteristics according to practice site

	Intervention Site 1^* (n=38)	Control Site 1^* (n=19)	Control Site 2 (n=22)
Characteristic	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
Non-white race	6 (16)	2 (11)	3 (14)
Women	24 (63)	10 (53)	14 (64)
Education <=12^th grade	2 (5)	8 (42)	8 (36)
Money left over	25 (66)	11 (58)	17 (77)
Married	27 (71)	9 (47)	13 (59)
Employed full-time	16 (42)	3 (16)	4 (18)
Excellent self-rated health	9 (24)	2 (11)	4 (18)
Best possible QOL	17 (45)	7 (37)	9 (41)
Living will A/M	8 (21)	5 (26)	5 (23)
Health care agent A/M	10 (26)	6 (32)	6 (27)
Communication A/M	24 (63)	10 (53)	8 (36)

QOL = quality of life, A/M = action/maintenance

^*

Intervention Site 1 and Control Site 1 refer to the same practice