. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jun 22;48(9):1754–1764. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01052-9

Table 2.

Regression Analyses Predicting Youth’s Social Functioning (N = 170)

	Antisocial Behavior				Prosocial Behavior
Predictors	B	SE B	β	t	B	SE B	β	t
Model 1
Maltreatment	0.10	0.04	0.18	2.51^*	−0.03	0.06	−0.04	−0.58
Perceptions	0.13	0.03	0.30	4.07^***	−0.22	0.04	−0.36	−4.91^***
					F (2, 165) = 13.15, p < .001, R² = .14
Overall Model	F (2, 165) = 13.64, p < .001, R² = .14

Model 2
Maltreatment	0.10	0.04	0.18	2.53^*	−0.04	0.06	−0.05	−0.68
Perceptions	0.11	0.05	0.26	2.17^*	−0.15	0.07	−0.25	−2.07^*
Maltreatment x Perceptions	0.03	0.07	0.05	0.41	−0.11	0.09	−0.14	−1.22
Overall Model	F (3, 164) = 9.10, p < .001, R² = .14, ΔR² = 0.001, p = 0.67				F (3, 164) = 9.29, p < .001, R² = .15, ΔR² = 0.008, p = .22

Note. For the maltreatment variable, comparison youth comprise the reference group. The perceptions variable refers to perceptions of unpredictability, with a higher score reflective of a greater unpredictability schema.

p < .05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001