Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 4;12:183–204. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S215370

Table 4.

Studies describing the outcome of eculizumab regimen discontinuation in aHUS patients

Study group Number of patients Median duration of eculizumab treatment Number of patients who discontinued treatment with eculizumab Median duration of follow-up after stopping treatment Number of patients who relapsed after discontinuation Proportion of relapsed patients with mutations and type of mutations Outcome
Ardissino et al84 (2015) 16 4.3 (0.5–14.4) months 16 0.7–40 months 5/16 (31.2%) 5/5 (CFH-4, CFI-1) All patients who relapsed were restarted on eculizumab and had rapid improvement of renal function.
Fakhouri et al83(2017) 108 17.5 months 38 22 months 12/38 (31.5%) 12/12 (CFH-8, MCP-4) All patients had rapid remission of TMA after restarting eculizumab with no long-term sequelae.
Meril et al47(2017) 17 3 months 15 10.2 months 3/15 (20%) 3/3 (CFH-2, ADAMTS 13–1) 2 of 3 patients restarted eculizumab and renal function returned to baseline.
Macia et al82(data from clinical trials) (2017) 130 6.3 months 61 6.3 months 12/61 (19.6) 7/12 (CHF-5, others-2) 3 patients progressed to ESRD with one patient requiring dialysis despite restarting eculizumab
Wijnsma et al85 (2017) 20 3.8 months 17 27.4 months 5/17 (29.4%) 5/5 (CFH-4, C3-1) No chronic sequelae after restart of eculizumab were noted.
Sheerin et al86 (2016) 43 6 months 14 12 months 3/14(21%) 2/3 (CFH-1, CD46-1) Complete recovery was noted in all three patients after reintroducing eculizumab.

Note: Data from references.47,8286

Abbreviations: TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; CFH, complement factor H; MCP, membrane cofactor protein; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.