Table 4.
Comparison between METS & SEWS and xDAWN algorithms. Descriptive statistics for all the subjects on letter accuracy are reported (mean, standard deviation, min., and max.).
| Preprocessing | μ | σ | Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1–19] Hz filter | 52.50 | 13.49 | 30.48 | 76.41 |
| xDAWN | 51.03 | 15.80 | 24.44 | 80.00 |
| METS & SEWS-1 | 56.00 | 13.64 | 35.56 | 80 |
| METS & SEWS-2 | 55.91 | 14.13 | 34.44 | 78.97 |
The best results are highlighted in bold.