Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;2019:8432953. doi: 10.1155/2019/8432953

Table 4.

Comparison between METS & SEWS and xDAWN algorithms. Descriptive statistics for all the subjects on letter accuracy are reported (mean, standard deviation, min., and max.).

Preprocessing μ σ Min. Max.
[119] Hz filter 52.50 13.49 30.48 76.41
xDAWN 51.03 15.80 24.44 80.00
METS & SEWS-1 56.00 13.64 35.56 80
METS & SEWS-2 55.91 14.13 34.44 78.97

The best results are highlighted in bold.