Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 4;22(6):785–803. doi: 10.1177/1368430218816962

Table 2c.

Perceived target qualities as a function of their presented sexism (Study 2).

Prejudiced
Nonprejudiced
ANOVA
M SD M SD
Morality 3.43 1.57 4.94 1.47 F(1, 132) = 31.32, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.19
Warmth 3.61 1.51 4.83 1.30 F(1, 132) = 23.67, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.15
Competence 4.17 1.51 5.18 1.42 F(1, 132) = 15.31, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.10
Judgmental 5.63 1.56 4.20 1.75 F(1, 132) = 24.74, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.16
Support gay rights 2.52 1.74 5.98 1.19 F(1, 132) = 164.13, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.55
Support Black rights 2.57 1.48 5.95 1.06 F(1, 132) = 210.06, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.61
Support women’s rights 1.63 1.36 6.64 0.93 F(1, 132) = 560.76, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.81
Support animal rights 3.05 1.68 6.33 0.82 F(1, 132) = 179.57, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.58
Predicted SDO 5.77 1.75 1.87 1.40 F(1, 132) = 189.19, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.59
Ideology 5.65 1.36 2.29 1.18 F(1, 132) = 219.52, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.62
Religiosity 4.39 1.71 3.38 1.41 F(1, 132) = 13.09, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.09
Overall feelings 3.19 1.83 4.73 1.74 F(1, 132) = 23.91, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.15
Overall role suitability 2.94 1.77 4.63 1.63 F(1, 132) = 31.61, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.19