Skip to main content
. 2019 May 13;92(1101):20181020. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181020

Table 3.

Comparison of the gHC threshold, Pontecorvo threshold and ROC optimised threshold.

n gHC threshold Pontecorvo threshold ROC optimised threshold
mcSUVR TPR FPR Acc MCC mcSUVR TPR FPR Acc MCC mcSUVR TPR FPR Acc MCC
All 100 1.17 96% 24% 85% 0.72 1.11 98% 33% 81% 0.67 1.32 87% 15% 86% 0.72
Type A 79 97% 12% 92% 0.85 97% 22% 87% 0.76 1.18 97% 12% 92% 0.85
Non-A 21 88% 62% 57% 0.23 100% 69% 57% 0.38 1.48 38% 0% 76% 0.52
Type B 15 100% 43% 80% 0.64 100% 43% 80% 0.64 - - - - -
Type C 6 N/A 100% 0% -1 N/A 100% 0% -1 - - - - -

Acc, accuracy; FPR, false positive rate; MCC, Matthews correlation coefficient; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TPR, true positive rate; mcSUVR, mean cortical standardised uptake value.