Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 23;1:100011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100011

Table 2.

Overview of various batches of bortezomib-encapsulated liposomes by passive and remote loading methods.

Loading method Entrapping agent Particle size
Bortezomib concentration µg/mL (%EE)
Mean ± SD Mode ± SD 10% DMSO 20% DMSO
Passive loading into aqueous core NA 97 ± 0.8 85 ± 1.0 39 (3.9%) 31 (3.1%)



Passive loading into bilayer NA 125 ± 3.9 112 ± 7.0 150 (15%)



Remote loading Sorbitol 10% 109 ± 0.8 95 ± 0.7 17 (1.7%), 10 (1%)
Sorbitol 20% 99 ± 0.6 86 ± 1.2 59 (5.9%)
Sorbitol 30% 122 ± 1.0 109 ± 1.2 8.6 (0.9%), 19 (2%)
Sorbitol 40% 120 ± 0.9 109 ± 1.4 6.6 (0.7%)
PVA 6 K (1% w/v) n.d. 60 (6%)
PVA 6 K (5% w/v) 125 ± 2.7 111 ± 0.7 147 (14.7%)
PVA 6 K (10% w/v) 124.1 ± 3.0
(PDI = 0.04 ± 0.04)*
20 (2%), 172 (17.2%)
PVA 6 K (0.2% w/v) 113 ± 1.6 95 ± 2.2 124 (12.4%), 94 (9.4%)
PVA 6 K (0.7% w/v) 112 ± 4.0 97 ± 5.0 653 (65.3%), 357 (35.7%), 334 (33.4%)
PVA 6 K (2% w/v) 107 ± 1.9 95 ± 3.8 381 (38.1%), 559 (55.9%)



Loading to PVA coated liposomes PVA 6 K (2%) 94 ± 2.1 85 ± 4.8 326 (32.6%), 445 (44.5%)

NA = not applicable; n.d. = not done; %EE = percentage encapsulation efficiency; PDI = polydispersity index; PVA, poly(vinyl alcohol).

*

Measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS).