Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;14(9):e0221863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221863

Table 2. Animals without BIBD included into the study (diagnosis based on the detection of intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in blood cells, using blood smears).

Animal (number) Age (years) Sex Weight (kg) S segment WB ELISA
UGV-1 UGV-1 UHV NP UHV NP-C
UGV-2 S5-like TSMV-2 IgY IgM IgY IgM IgY IgM IgY IgM
2.01 2 M 0.9 - + + ++ + - + + + + +
2.02 2 M 1.5 - + + ++ +++ - + + - + +
2.03 2 F 1.3 - + + - + - - - - + +
2.04 3 M 1.2 - + + +++ ++ + + - - + +
2.05 3 M 1.3 + + + - - - + + - + +
2.06 3 M 1.7 - + + + +++ - - - - - -
2.07 3 M 1.8 - + + - ++ - + - - + -
2.08 3 F 2.2 - + + - - - + - - - -
2.09 4 M 2.1 + + + +++ ++ + - + - - -
2.10 4 M 2.7 + + + +++ +++ - + - + - -
2.11 4 M 3.3 + + + ++ ++ + - + + + +
2.12 4 F 3.7 - + + +++ +++ + + + - + +
2.13 4 F 3.8 - + + ++ ++ + + + + + +
2.14 4 F 5.8 - + + +++ ++ + + - - - -
2.15 4 F 6.8 - - - - - - - - - - -
2.16 5 M 2.2 + + + - - + - + - + +
2.17 5 M 2.5 - + + + + - - + + + +
2.18 5 F 5.0 + - + - + + - - - - -
2.19 5 F 5.3 - + - ++ + + + - - - -
2.20 5 F 5.3 - - - + - + - - - - -
2.21 5 F 5.5 - + + ++ - + - + - + +
2.22 5 F 5.7 - - + ++ - + + + + + +
2.23 5 F 6.1 - + + +++ + + - + - - -
2.24 6 M 2.5 + + + - - + - - - - -
2.25 6 M 3.4 + + + - - + + - - - -
2.26 6 M 3.5 - + + - + - - - - - -
2.27 6 F 3.1 - - - +++ +++ + + + + + -
2.28 6 F 5.6 - + + +++ +++ + - - - - -
2.29 7 M 3.3 + + - - ++ - - - - - -
2.30 7 M 4.0 - + + +++ + + - - - - -
2.31 7 F 5.0 + - + +++ +++ + - + - + -
2.32 7 F 7.0 - + + +++ +++ + - + + + +
2.33 7 F 7.5 - + + ++ ++ + + - - - +
2.34 7 F 10.0 - + + +++ +++ + - + + + +
2.35 8 M 3.4 - + + +++ + + - + + + +
2.36 8 F 7.0 - - - +++ ++ + + - - + +

n.a.–not available; F–female; M–male; S segment–reptareavirus S segment determined by RT-PCR; WB–Western Blot; Western Blot results graded according to signal intensity:—(negative), + (weakly positive), ++ (moderately positive), +++ (strongly positive); ELISA–Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.