Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Jul 22;14(4):328–337. doi: 10.1177/1556264619862467

Table 2:

Study participants’ expressed satisfaction with informed consent simulation

Simulated Genetics Protocol Depression Diabetes P value
N=47 N=30
Survey Item mean sd mean sd
Sufficiency of Information Provided
 How much information was provided to make decision 5.91 1.40 5.78 1.54 0.7
 How well were questions about study answered 7.80 1.61 8.25 1.27 0.18
Readiness to make a decision
 How much time to think about decision to participate 7.30 2.29 8.16 1.61 0.05
 How ready to make decision about participation after reading consent form 7.34 1.82 8.03 1.58 0.08
Interaction during Consent
 How much pressure felt to agree to participate 1.98 1.74 1.69 1.71 0.46
 How comfortable with process of going over consent form 8.00 1.44 8.28 1.30 0.37
 Interaction with researcher influenced likelihood of participation 7.06 1.69 7.22 1.52 0.67

A significance level of 0.05 was used