Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jul 1;25(8):857–867. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000614

Table 4.

Pearson’s correlations between cognitive test scores and cerebral volumes

LAV HOC
Cognitive Tests r p r p
NIHTB-CB Fluid Composite −.35 .008 .41 .002
  Dimensional Card Sort −.36 .008 .29 .037
  Flanker Inhibitory Control & Attention −.18 .198 .13 .344
  Picture Sequencing Memory −.28 .043 .37 .006
  List Sorting Working Memory −.06 .670 .10 .477
  Pattern Comparison Processing Speed −.29 .038 .29 .033
NIHTB-CB Crystallized Composite −.03 .840 .24 .084
  Picture Vocabulary .02 .866 .19 .174
  Oral Reading Recognition −.04 .766 .18 .193
GS Fluid Composite −.26 .059 .26 .052
  Trail Making Test – Part B .12 .365 −.13 .330
  Stroop Color Word −.24 .072 .28 .035
  RAVLT −.23 .091 .27 .048
  Digit Span −.01 .970 .16 .240
  Digit Symbol −.31 .023 .24 .076
GS Crystallized Composite (AmNART) .09 .531 .11 .436

Notes. LAV = lateral ventricles; HOC = hippocampal occupancy score. Both LAV and HOC values reflect combined bilateral volumes, in cm3, normalized to percent intracranial volume. Values in bold are statistically significant at p < .05.