Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 17;2016(11):CD004870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004870.pub5
Methods RCT Number analysed/randomised: 3036/3766 Intention‐to‐treat: calculated Power analysis: calculated Funding source: NR
Participants Chronic neck pain
Participant recruitment: Participants with neck pain asked a participating physician for acupuncture, or physician considered acupuncture to be adequate treatment
Interventions INDEX TREATMENT
Immediate acupuncture treatment plus additional conventional treatment as needed
Participants could be treated individually, and numbers of needles and acupuncture points used were chosen at the discretion of physicians. Only needle acupuncture (with disposable 1‐time needles) and manual stimulation were allowed, whereas other forms of acupuncture treatment were not allowed
COMPARISON TREATMENT
Conventional treatment; delayed acupuncture treatment 3 months after study onset
Control group was not allowed to use any kind of acupuncture during first 3 months
CO‐INTERVENTION
Comparable between index and control groups. Participants were free to use conventional routine medical care as offered by German social health insurance funds
Treatment schedule: Each participant in the randomised acupuncture group received up to 15 acupuncture sessions during first 3 months and no acupuncture sessions between 3 and 6 months
Duration of treatment: 3 months
Duration of follow‐up: 3 months after treatment
Outcomes HEALTH AND WELL‐BEING
Neck and pain disability assessed by validated neck and pain disability scale developed by Wheeler
Baseline mean: 55.0 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 56.0 (immediate acupuncture non‐randomised), 53.9 delayed acupuncture
% reduction in neck pain and disability
Time 1 (3 months): 28.9 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 31.7 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 5.8 delayed acupuncture
Time 2 (6 months): 28.0 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 30.6 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 25.1 delayed acupuncture
Reported results: significant at time 1
SMD ‐35.53 (95% CI random ‐36.37 to ‐34.69) at 3 month follow‐up
SMD 4.14 (95% CI random 4.02 to 4.26) at 6 month follow‐up
SF‐36 PHYSICAL COMPONENT SCORE
Baseline mean: 37.6 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 36.7 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 38.1 delayed acupuncture
Time 1 (3 months): 5.8 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 6.8 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 4.7 delayed acupuncture
Time 2 (6 months): 5.6 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 6.8 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 0.7 delayed acupuncture
SMD 22.99 (95% CI random 22.45 to 23.54) at 3 month follow‐up
SMD 3.00 (95% CI random 2.90 to 3.10) at 6 month follow‐up
SF‐36 MENTAL COMPONENT SCORE
Baseline mean: 43.1 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 42.8 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 43.8 delayed acupuncture
Time 1 (3 months): 4.2 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 4.7 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 3.1 delayed acupuncture
Time 2 (6 months): 4.0 immediate acupuncture (randomised), 4.8 immediate acupuncture (non‐randomised), 3.1 delayed acupuncture
SMD 12.80 (95% CI random 12.49 to 13.11) at 3 month follow‐up
SMD 3.00 (95% CI random 2.90 to 3.10) at 6 month follow‐up
Reasons for drop‐out: 315 participants could not be included in the ITT analysis because the study office did not receive the consent form
Adverse effects: 8.9% of cases (n = 1005); 1216 side effects were reported: 57% minor local bleeding or hematoma, 10% pain (e.g. needling pain), 4% vegetative symptoms, 29% other
Costs of care: acupuncture treatment associated with higher costs (€925.53 ± 1551.06 vs €648.06 ± 1459.13); however according to assumed threshold values beyond 3 month follow‐up, acupuncture appears cost‐effective. Also, over‐the‐counter medications were not included in the cost of routine care
Notes ‐‐
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised using a central telephone randomisation procedure
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Study office included participants into the study
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes ‐ patient? High risk Not possible
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes ‐ care provider? High risk Not possible
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes ‐ outcome assessor? High risk Participant as outcome assessor not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ Drop out rate acceptable? High risk Drop‐outs not adequately described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ Analyzed in the group to which they were allocated? Unclear risk Unclear whether ITT was done correctly
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol
Similarity of baseline characteristics Low risk Reported to be similar
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? Unclear risk Not reported
Compliance acceptable? Low risk Most participants (77.3%) received 5 to 10 sessions, whereas 17.7% received more than 10 sessions and 5% fewer than 5 sessions
Similar timing of outcome assessment? Low risk Assessed at 3 and 6 months
Fatal Flaw Low risk Acceptable

Abbreviations: BL = bladder CI = confidence interval cm = centimetre dn = dry needling EAP = electroacupuncture

g = gauge GB = gallbladderITT = intention‐to‐treat LI = large intestine LLLT0 = placebo intestine mg = milligram mm = millimetreMPS = myofascial neck pain syndrome MTrP = muscles treated not described NA = not applicable NDI = Neck Disability Index NLA = non‐local needle electroacupuncture NPQ = Northwick Park Pain Questionnaire NR = not reported NSAID = non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug NTPA = non‐trigger point acupuncture OD = daily PPT = pain pressure threshold RA = remote acupuncture RCT = randomised controlled trial SA = standard acupuncture SD = standard deviation SF‐36 = Short Form‐36 SH = sham treatment SI = small intestine SMD = standardised mean difference TCM = Traditional Chinese Medicine TE = triple energiser TENS = transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation TNS = transcutaneous nerve stimulation TPA = trigger point acupuncture TrP = trigger point acupuncture VAS = visual analogue scale WAD = whiplash‐associated disorder