Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0972-5

Table 8.

Summary of findings table for treatment with erenumab 140 mg monthly subcutaneous injection compared with no treatment for prevention of episodic migraine

Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects*(95% CI) Relative effect(95% CI) № of participants (studies) Certainty of the evidence(GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo Risk with erenumab
Reduction in migraine days follow up: 6 months The mean reduction in migraine days was −1.8 days The mean reduction in migraine days in the intervention group was 1.9 days fewer (2.3 fewer to 1.4 fewer) 634(1 RCT) ⨁⨁⨁◯MEDIUMa Treatment with erenumab 140 mg results in reduction in migraine days compared with placebo.
Reduction in use of acute attack medicationfollow up: 6 months The mean reduction in use of acute attack medication was − 0.2 days The mean reduction in use of acute attack medication in the intervention group was 1.4 days fewer (1.7 fewer to 1.1 fewer) 634(1 RCT) ⨁⨁⨁◯MEDIUMa Treatment with erenumab 140 mg results in reduction in number of days of use of acute attack medication compared with placebo.

Improvement in functional MPFID everyday-activities

follow up: 6 months

The mean improvement in functional MPFID everyday-activities was − 3.3 points The mean improvement in functional MPFID everyday-activities in the intervention group was 2.6 points lower (3.6 fewer to 1.5 fewer) 634(1 RCT) ⨁⨁⨁◯MEDIUMa Treatment with erenumab 140 mg results in improvement in functional MPFID everyday-activities score compared with placebo.
At least 50% reduction in days of migraine follow up: 6 months 266 per 1000 494 per 1000(353 to 690) RR 1.8810(1.5191 to 2.3290) 634(1 RCT) ⨁⨁⨁◯MEDIUMa Treatment with erenumab 140 mg results in at least 50% reduction of days of migraine compared with placebo.

Serious adverse events

follow up: 6 months

22 per 1000 19 per 1000(6 to 55) RR 1.0871(0.2913 to 2.5224) 638(1 RCT) ⨁⨁⨁◯MEDIUMa Treatment with erenumab 140 mg results in a small possibly unimportant effect in serious adverse events occurrence compared with placebo.
Mortality follow up: 6 months 0 per 1000

0 per 1000

(0 to 0)

Not estimable 638(1 RCT) No deaths occurred during the double-blind treatment phase of the trial.

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; aDowngraded once due to inconsistency.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect