Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio and level of significance for analysis of the association between diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency and diagnosis of depression

Parameter	Model 1a			Model 2b			Model 3c
	OR	p value	CI	OR	p value	CI	OR	p value	CI
Vitamin D Status
No Deficient Diagnosis	1			1			1
Deficient Diagnosis	5.84	< 0.001	5.41–6.33	5.38	< 0.001	4.95–5.88	1.22	< 0.001	1.11–1.33
Gender
Male				1			1
Female				2.34	< 0.001	2.25–2.42	1.35	< 0.001	1.29–1.40
Age Group, Years
18–24				2.22	< 0.001	2.05–2.40	1.13	0.006	1.04–1.24
25–34				1.55	< 0.001	1.45–1.67	1.15	< 0.001	1.07–1.25
35–44				1.17	< 0.001	1.09–1.23	1.14	0.001	1.05–1.23
45–64				1			1
Service Type
Active Guard				1			1
Active Duty				3.29	< 0.001	3.11–3.48	1.24	< 0.001	1.16–1.32
Career Type
Officer				1			1
Enlisted				2.62	< 0.001	2.46–2.79	1.66	< 0.001	1.56–1.78
Career Progression
Senior Rank				1			1
Junior Rank				1.05	0.019	1.01–1.10	1.02	0.443	0.97–1.06
MTF Location
Watertown, NY				1	< 0.001		1	< 0.001
Fairbanks, AK				1.34	< 0.001	1.19–1.49	1.92	< 0.001	1.71–2.17
Killeen, TX				2.41	< 0.001	2.25–2.58	2.94	< 0.001	2.73–3.16
Tacoma, WA				1.19	< 0.001	1.10–1.28	1.53	< 0.001	1.41–1.66
El Paso, TX				1.35	< 0.001	1.25–1.45	1.99	< 0.001	1.85–2.16
Fayetteville, NC				1.15	< 0.001	1.07–1.24	1.54	< 0.001	1.43–1.67

Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

^aincludes only vitamin D diagnosis

^bincludes vitamin D diagnosis, MTF location, gender, age group, service type, career type, and career progression

^cincludes vitamin D diagnosis, MTF location, gender, age group, service type, career type, career progression, and associated encounters as a continuous variable