. 2009 Jan 29;1(1):58–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2008.00011.x

Table 3.

Analysis of different PUMC classification AIS patients and two SPN

	AIS		Controls		χ²‐value	P‐value
	C	T	C	T	χ²‐value	P‐value
rs12885713 allele
PUMC I ^†	37	9	163	37	0.028	0.867
PUMC II ^‡	96	38	163	37	4.478	0.034
PUMC III ^§	16	4	163	37	0.000	1.000
	χ²‐value = 1.739
	P‐value = 0.419^*
rs5871 allele
PUMC I ^†	24	22	109	91	0.082	0.775
PUMC II ^‡	59	75	109	91	3.519	0.061
PUMC III ^§	12	8	109	91	0.222	0.637
	χ²‐value = 2.292
	P‐value = 0.318^*

Comparison among three subtypes.

^{^†}

23 patients.

^{^‡}

67 patients.

^{^§}

10 patients.