Hypothetical free-energy profiles for wild type and protein variants
of ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and deprotonation of UMP to form UMP vinyl
carbanion intermediates UMP-, which are drawn to show the difference in the stabilization
of the respective transition states by interactions with the protein
catalyst. These profiles were constructed using kinetic data from Table 1, and assuming that
the changes in protein structure effect similar changes in the barriers
for ScOMPDC-catalyzed deprotonation of FUMP and UMP.6 The diagrams show:
(1) The ca. 11 kcal/mol difference in the stabilization of the transition
states for wildtype ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP (ΔΔG‡)dc and deprotonation of UMP (ΔΔG‡)dp [(ΔΔG‡)dc – (ΔΔG‡)dp = 11 kcal/mol, Figure 7], that we propose
is due to stabilization of the former transition state by interactions
with the nascent CO2 product. (2) The difference between
the effects of Q215A or Y217F substitutions on ΔΔGUMP‡ (relatively large) and ΔΔGOMP [smaller, Table 3]. (3) The larger
effect of amino acid substitutions on the stability of the Michaelis
complexes to OMP (ΔΔGOMPB) compared with UMP/FUMP (ΔΔGFUMP). The ca 8
kcal/mol barrier to krot, which is required
for the deuterium exchange reaction of UMP (kex) but not for decarboxylation of OMP (kdc) or deprotonation of UMP (kdp), is not shown. The barriers to the two enzymatic
reactions have not been scaled to show the thermodynamic driving force
to decarboxylation of OMP to form UMP, because
this driving force is not known.