Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;11:8229–8238. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S213931

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of  eltrombopag (EP) and/or decitabine (DAC) on cell cycle distribution in myeloid leukemia cell lines. (A) Variation in the cell cycle distribution of K562 cells cultured with EP and/or DAC and the comparison of significantly increased proportions of cells in different phases of the cell cycle. (B) Cell cycle distributions of K562 cells following EP and/or DAC treatment. (C) Variation in the cell cycle distribution of THP-1 cells cultured with EP and/or DAC and the comparison of significantly increased proportions of cells in different phases of the cell cycle. (D) Cell cycle distributions of THP-1 cells following EP and/or DAC treatment. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (****p<0.0001; ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; **p<0.05).