Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;69(6):921–929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1029

Table 4.

Clinical Response at Follow-up Visit

Population Eravacycline
(Clinical Cure/Total)
Meropenem
(Clinical Cure/Total)
Difference (95% Confidence Interval)
Intent-to-treat 224/250 (89.6) 226/250 (90.4) –0.8 (–6.2, 4.6)
Modified intent-to-treat 224/250 (89.6) 226/249 (90.8) –1.2 (–6.5, 4.2)
Microbiological intent-to-treat 170/195 (87.2) 185/205 (90.2) –3.1 (–9.5, 3.2)
Clinically evaluable 220/229 (96.1) 221/231 (95.7) 0.4 (–3.5, 4.3)
Microbiologically evaluable 168/177 (94.9) 184/192 (95.8) –0.9 (–5.7, 3.6)