Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;149(9):1585–1595. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz094

TABLE 5.

Supplementary iron intake and fecundability among women planning a pregnancy in the Snart Foraeldre and PRESTO cohorts1

Pregnancies, n Cycles at risk, n Age-adjusted FR (95% CI) Multivariable model2 FR (95% CI)
Snart Foraeldre, n = 1693
 Iron-containing supplements
  Nonuser 453 2494 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
  Any iron-containing supplement user 686 3672 1.06 (0.95, 1.18) 1.01 (0.90, 1.13)
 Supplement type
  Nonuser 453 2494 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
  Multivitamin user 616 3346 1.05 (0.94, 1.17) 1.01 (0.90, 1.13)
  Iron-only supplement user 70 326 1.15 (0.92, 1.44) 1.05 (0.84, 1.32)
PRESTO, n = 2969
 Iron-containing supplements
  Nonuser 185 1559 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
  Any iron-containing supplement user 1631 10,841 1.25 (1.08, 1.43) 1.19 (1.03, 1.38)
 Supplement type
  Nonuser 185 1559 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
  Multivitamin user 1436 9509 1.25 (1.08, 1.44) 1.19 (1.03, 1.38)
  Iron-only supplement user 195 1332 1.23 (1.02, 1.48) 1.20 (0.99, 1.44)
1

FR, fecundability ratio

2

Adjusted for age, vocational training/education, BMI, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, use of oral contraceptives, cycle regularity and length, doing something to improve chances of conception, use of vitamin C supplements, and dietary vitamin C (continuous). The PRESTO models are also adjusted for race/ethnicity.