Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;53(10):886–895. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay097

Table 3.

Results from repeated measures regression models examining relationships between pretransplant FFMQ subscales, experiential avoidance, and psychological functioning outcomes

Depression (IDAS) Somatic anxiety (IDAS) Intrusive thoughts (IES-R)
Coef. z p Coef. z p Coef. z p
Mindfulness
 Describing −.368 −4.68 <.001* −.209 −2.61 .009* −.150 −2.12 .034
 Acting with Awareness −.392 −5.04 <.001* −.331 −4.32 <.001* −.186 −2.63 .008*
 Nonjudging of Experience −.279 −3.37 .001* −.073 –0.88 .378 −.218 −3.09 .002*
 Nonreactivity to Experience −.242 −2.94 .003* −.208 −2.62 .009* −.071 −0.99 .322
 Observing −.025 –0.37 .709 .051 0.60 .548 .086 1.16 .245
Experiential Avoidance .110 1.22 .222 .034 0.40 .692 .108 1.46 .143

*p value is statistically significant after FDR procedure.

Outcomes were assessed pre-HSCT and 1, 3, and 6 months post-HSCT. All models covaried for time since transplant, transplant type, age, and sex. Mindfulness scores, experiential avoidance scores, and psychological functioning outcomes were standardized. Therefore, coefficients represent the change in standard deviation units of the psychological functioning outcome measure per standard deviation difference in the mindfulness or experiential avoidance scales.