Table 2.
The table presents sequencing data obtained with the different purification methods shown in Figure 5 and for the three repeats on BAC DNA
| Method | # bases (bp) | # reads | N50 | Mapped bases on target region | Cov target | Cov matrix | Enrichment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAC 30 kb | 60 657 835 | 12 056 | 7401 | 74% | 1422 | 112 | 12.7 |
| 59 356 468 | 6124 | 12 665 | 80% | 1525 | 129 | 11.9 | |
| 106 274 884 | 14 161 | 8428 | 78% | 2592 | 241 | 10.8 | |
| ADNg—Method 1 | 679 211 859 | 134 435 | 5593 | 0.5% | 103 | 1.2 | 84 |
| ADNg—Method 2 | 325 120 000 | 43 863 | 8268 | 4.6% | 448 | 0.5 | 892 |
| 750 242 645 | 101 146 | 8264 | 2.2% | 498 | 1.2 | 416 | |
| ADNg—Method 3 | 43 882 868 | 9725 | 6415 | 0.3% | 4.3 | 0.08 | 56 |