Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 11;35(17):2957–2965. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz016

Table 2.

The best performance achieved by single types of features for the second task

Sub-classifier Features Dimension Sn (%) Sp (%) Acc(%) MCC
1st KNN 15 90.26 75.64 84.30 0.6723
BPB 162 88.55 76.76 83.74 0.6609
DNC 4 89.08 29.67 64.86 0.237
MNC 3 88.84 27.10 63.67 0.2055
DAC 12 90.2 24.01 63.22 0.1925
2nd KNN 3 86.36 91.06 89.11 0.7754
BPB 130 89.05 92.67 91.17 0.8179
DNC 8 21.9 90.32 61.92 0.1698
MNC 3 2.89 98.24 58.66 0.0378
DAC 12 33.06 84.31 63.04 0.2037
3rd KNN 11 80.07 86.7 83.87 0.6696
BPB 80 83.51 87.47 85.78 0.7094
DNC 10 26.80 85.93 60.7 0.159
MNC 2 1.72 99.49 57.77 0.0592
DAC 6 13.75 92.58 58.94 0.1038
4th KNN 5 82.82 89.04 86.45 0.7206
BPB 70 82.21 86.40 84.65 0.6850
DNC 14 42.33 78.51 63.43 0.2238
MNC 3 26.99 87.28 62.15 0.1806
DAC 12 49.08 75.00 64.19 0.2488
5th KNN 1 96.27 82.98 90.79 0.8107
BPB 140 94.78 91.49 93.42 0.8641
DNC 10 79.10 60.64 71.49 0.4046
MNC 3 91.04 7.45 56.58 −0.0269
DAC 10 76.12 58.51 68.86 0.3509