Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug;31(4):632–640. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.04.07

2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS

Characteristics Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
PFS, progression-free survival; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; SUVmax, the maximum standardized uptake values; SUVmean, mean standardized uptake values; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Age (<60vs. ≥60 years) 1.29 (0.79−2.09) 0.300
Sex (male vs. female) 1.00 (0.56−1.77) 0.992
Lauren’s classification (diffused vs. undiffused) 1.11 (0.63−1.93) 0.721
Lymph node metastasis (no vs. yes) 2.74 (1.31−5.74) 0.004 2.16 (1.01−4.65) 0.048
T stage (T2/T3 vs. T4) 1.71 (1.17−2.50) 0.001 1.89 (1.11−3.16) 0.020
Histologic grade (poorly and moderately-poorly vs. moderately) 0.64 (0.35−1.18) 0.145
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (no vs. yes) 1.34 (0.82−2.19) 0.240
Surgery (subtotal gastrectomy vs. total gastrectomy) 1.32 (0.83−2.12) 0.238
Lymph node dissection (D1 vs. D0) 2.05 (0.93−4.48) 0.065
HER2 expression (positive vs. negative) 0.80 (0.46−1.39) 0.421
Ki-67 expression (≥75% vs. <75%) 1.02 (0.61−1.73) 0.936
c-Met expression (positive vs. negative) 0.40 (0.33−1.37) 0.262
EGFR expression (positive vs. negative) 1.09 (0.64−1.84) 0.746
SUVmax (<10.9vs. ≥10.9) 0.69 (0.33−1.47) 0.310
SUVmean (<5.9vs. ≥5.9) 0.60 (0.26−1.38) 0.215
MTV (<15.1 cm3 vs. ≥15.1 cm3) 1.67 (1.03−2.71) 0.033 1.13 (0.46−2.82) 0.789
TLG (<47.3 cm3 vs. ≥47.3 cm3) 1.70 (1.04−2.79) 0.032 1.96 (0.90−4.27) 0.502