Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug;31(4):632–640. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.04.07

3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS

Characteristics Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
OS, overall survival; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; SUVmax, the maximum standardized uptake values; SUVmean, mean standardized uptake values; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Age (<60vs. ≥60 years) 0.90 (0.86−1.56) 0.722
Sex (male vs. female) 0.94 (0.49−1.80) 0.852
Lauren’s classification (diffused vs. undiffused) 1.31 (0.68−2.53) 0.403
Lymph node metastasis (no vs. yes) 1.70 (0.77−3.80) 0.150
T stage (T2/T3 vs. T4) 1.79 (1.12−2.87) 0.005 2.33 (1.21−4.51) 0.012
Histologic grade (poorly vs. moderately-poorly or Moderately) 0.41 (0.18−0.97) 0.029 0.39 (0.17−0.94) 0.035
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (no vs. yes) 1.35 (0.76−2.41) 0.289
Surgery (subtotal gastrectomy vs. total gastrectomy) 1.05 (0.60−1.82) 0.873
Lymph node dissection (D1 vs. D0) 1.35 (0.42−4.35) 0.601
HER2 expression (positive vs. negative) 0.74 (0.38−1.44) 0.37
Ki-67 expression (≥75% vs. <75%) 1.17 (0.62−2.21) 0.614
c-Met expression (positive vs. negative) 0.50 (0.19−1.28) 0.128
EGFR expression (positive vs. negative) 0.95 (0.49−1.86) 0.887
SUVmax (<10.9vs. ≥10.9) 0.45 (0.16−1.25) 0.106
SUVmean (<5.9vs. ≥5.9) 0.44 (0.14−1.40) 0.139
MTV (<15.1 cm3 vs. ≥15.1 cm3) 1.79 (1.01−3.18) 0.037 1.21 (0.45−3.26) 0.701
TLG (<47.3 cm3 vs. ≥47.3 cm3) 1.90 (1.05−3.45) 0.028 2.10 (1.13−3.89) 0.019