Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 10;9:13075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48999-0

Table 1.

Comparisons of the electroanalytical parameter such as a limit of detection and linear range of DA obtained at proposed core-shell Mo NPs@f-MWCNTs sensor with previously reported DA sensor.

Electrode LOD (µM) Linear range (µM) Method Ref.
aAg2Se/bMoSe2/cGCE 0.009 0.05–1100 AMP 3
Graphene-dMoS2/GCE 0.007 0.05–10 CAMP 9
eMoOx/fSPCE 0.043 0.01–650 SWV 5
gCQD-SPCE 0.099 1–7 CV 2
hPd@Au/iN,S-MGA-5 0.00036 0.001–100 DPV 48
jGR/kGLN 0.0045 0.05–79.5 DPV 11
lMIPs/mZNTs/nFTO/GCE 0.02 510–800 DPV 49
Au-Cu2O/°rGO 3.9 10–90 DPV 50
β-MnO2 nanorice 0.0082 0.03–65 CAMP 20
Mo NPs@f-MWCNTs 0.00126 0.01–1609 AMP This work

aAg2Se; Silver selenide: bMoSe2; molybdenum selenide: cGCE glassy carbon electrode, dMoS2; Molybdenum disulfide: eMoOx; Molybdenum oxide nanoparticles: fSPCE; Screen printed carbon electrode: gCQD; Carbon quantum dots: hPd@Au; palladium@gold nanoalloys: iN,S-MGA-5; Nitrogen and Sulphur functionalized multiple graphene aerogel: jGR; graphite: kGLN; gelatin: lMIPs; Molecularly imprinted polymers arrays: mZNTs; ZnO nanotubes: nFTO; Fluorine Tin oxide; °rGO; Reduced graphene oxide.