Table 3.
Deciding research focus | Designing research methodology and method | Data generation | Data analysis | Taking action | Report writing | Dissemination | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co‐option | |||||||
Compliance | |||||||
Consultation | X | x | x | ||||
Co‐operation | X | x | X | x | x | x | |
Co‐learning | x | x | x | x | x | ||
Collective Action | x | x | x |
Key | |
---|---|
Co‐option | Token representatives are chosen but have no real input or power in the research process |
Compliance | Outsiders decide the research agenda and direct the process, with tasks assigned to participants |
Consultation | Local opinions are asked for, but outside researchers conduct the work and decide on a course of action |
Co‐operation | Local people work together with outside researchers to determine priorities, with responsibility remaining with outsiders for directing the process; |
Co‐learning | Local people and outsiders share their knowledge to create new understanding and work together to form action plans—facilitation provided |
Collective action | Local people set their own agenda and mobilise to carry out research in the absence of outside initiators and facilitators |
Adapted from the work of Cornwall A. Unpacking ‘Participation’: Models, Meanings and Practices, Community Development Journal 43(3) 2008; 269‐283 and Cook T, Boote J, Buckley N, Vougioukalou S, Wright M. Accessing Participatory Research Impact and Legacy: Developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educational Action Research 2017; 25(4) 473‐488.