Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 4;2019(9):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5

Comparison 4. Flecainide versus placebo or no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Withdrawals due to adverse effects – main analysis 1 73 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 15.41 [0.91, 260.19]
2 Proarrhythmia – main analysis 4 511 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.80 [1.30, 17.77]
3 Proarrhythmia – sensitivity analysis: persistent atrial fibrillation 2 435 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.35 [0.91, 44.22]
4 Proarrhythmia – sensitivity analysis: low risk of bias studies 2 435 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.35 [0.91, 44.22]
5 Proarrhythmia – sensitivity analysis: studies > 200 participants 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6 Stroke – main analysis 1 362 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.04 [0.11, 39.00]
7 Stroke – subgroup analysis: persistent atrial fibrillation 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
8 Stroke – sensitivity analysis: low risk of bias studies 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
9 Stroke – sensitivity analysis: studies > 200 participants 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
10 Atrial fibrillation recurrence – main analysis 4 511 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.55, 0.77]
11 Atrial fibrillation recurrence – sensitivity analysis: persistent atrial fibrillation 2 435 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.60, 0.85]
12 Atrial fibrillation recurrence – sensitivity analysis: low risk of bias studies 2 435 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.60, 0.85]
13 Atrial fibrillation recurrence – sensitivity analysis: studies > 200 participants 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only